Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread

01-29-2017 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rawlz517
Neville looks way to ripped to be sub-205
He isn't very tall though. Compare him to a guy like Daniel Cormier in UFC. I think he weighs close to if not under 205.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rawlz517
Neville looks way to ripped to be sub-205
He is about 5'4" which helps
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingOfFelt
He isn't very tall though. Compare him to a guy like Daniel Cormier in UFC. I think he weighs close to if not under 205.
I think Neville is 5'8". Cormier is a ****ing tank. He fights at 205.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:30 PM
The tables are magically constructed again...
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:31 PM
this is what the cruiserweights need to be. just let em loose.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:32 PM
Just getting home now what happened in the Owens reigns match
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:33 PM
And cliffs generally? Good show?
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:33 PM
Swann Neville is a lot of fun so far.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:34 PM
Alright this is coming from a guy who has never been to a Live WWE event so take this as far as you want... Unless you are in the first few rows by the ring, why would you want to sit on the floor like 50-60 rows back? I would rather just sit in the stands where you are elevated and can actually see. I'm not sure on various price points though. I would say this is only true in the big stadiums they go to for the big 4 PPV's

Anyone have a little insight?
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diskoteque
Just getting home now what happened in the Owens reigns match
Braunterference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by diskoteque
And cliffs generally? Good show?
Very good imo.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diskoteque
And cliffs generally? Good show?
So good that the cruiserweight match is probably a recommendation to watch later.

Owens vs. Reigns was really good. North of 4*
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diskoteque
Just getting home now what happened in the Owens reigns match
ko superman punched reigns with a pair of brass knuckles


later ko won the match


these are misleading cliffs
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:36 PM
I guess the Red Arrow is too much of a 'face' finisher, but it's a shame to shelve that move because its a damn beauty.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:36 PM
Terrific match, I was expecting a squash.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:36 PM
That Crusierweight match was fun. Is CW stuff usually that good?
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:36 PM
that was good
id watch 205 live a lot more if matches were like that


giving neville a submission finisher sucks so much
great decision for a heel turn lol
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S
Yeah true, still feels something is getting added or dragged out though.
They're almost certainly going to do a "Seth Rollins gets kicked out of the Alamodome" segment.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:37 PM
Pretty good show when the cruiserweight match is the worst on the main card so far.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:37 PM
That submission looks like it really hurts
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golf_God_23
Alright this is coming from a guy who has never been to a Live WWE event so take this as far as you want... Unless you are in the first few rows by the ring, why would you want to sit on the floor like 50-60 rows back? I would rather just sit in the stands where you are elevated and can actually see. I'm not sure on various price points though. I would say this is only true in the big stadiums they go to for the big 4 PPV's

Anyone have a little insight?
I've been 8th row floor at an arena show and it wasn't great.. Non-floor side lower bowl is still better. 50-60 rows back on the floor would be absolutely brutal imo
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DatFirefly
I guess the Red Arrow is too much of a 'face' finisher, but it's a shame to shelve that move because its a damn beauty.
He still breaks it out from time to time, it's just not something he does often because of the pop it gets
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RT
That Crusierweight match was fun. Is CW stuff usually that good?
Hell no. 205 Live is not even a top 10 show on the Network and reportedly Vince and Co are looking at what to do with/about it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by darO
That submission looks like it really hurts
Hell yeah. Loved it. It's like a hardcore version of the Regal Stretch.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:39 PM
The **** is this Vuudu ****?
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:40 PM
My favorite part of the upcoming match, aside from Cena's shoulderblocks of course, will be when Cena slaps on the STF and then, after a moment, tucks his head to blatantly announce to AJ that it's time for him to work his way out of the hold now.
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote
01-29-2017 , 09:40 PM
For the love of everything good and holy in this world: #beatupjohncena
Royal Rumble 2017: PPV Discussion Thread Quote

      
m