Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Internet Poker > Internet Poker > CarbonPoker & Aced

CarbonPoker & Aced Sponsored Support forum for Merge Gaming Flagship Brand CarbonPoker.ag and Aced.com

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2012, 11:24 PM   #91
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,093
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

For limit on Merge right now on a Saturday night there is one 1/2 game, one half filled .50/1.00 game and one 2/4 game. High rake has already killed limit on Merge. I don't think any promises in the future of lower rake is going to bring it back. Everyone has already moved to greener pastures.

Merge is entirely to blame for this. It doesn't matter if they change things for the better now. It's to late to get back these players. The only hope left is the new players in the micro's move into the .50/1.00 games one day. Will be a hard task to rebuild an entire player base at this point though. They just wiped out low and medium level limit players from it's player base. They all got tired of waiting for change and moved to a different network.

"Pressing hard" to implement change now is like drinking from an empty glass at this point. There's nobody left. You will have to rebuild from scratch.
Synergistic Explosions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2012, 11:41 PM   #92
veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,382
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Very constructive tone.
dark_horse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 05:50 AM   #93
Minbet Millionaire
 
kahntrutahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Un-official Internet Poker Support
Posts: 4,325
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synergistic Explosions View Post
For limit on Merge right now on a Saturday night there is one 1/2 game, one half filled .50/1.00 game and one 2/4 game. High rake has already killed limit on Merge. I don't think any promises in the future of lower rake is going to bring it back. Everyone has already moved to greener pastures.

You left out the SIX 5/10+ games that I played for the last ELEVEN hours.

Cheers,

--
Kahn
kahntrutahn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 06:47 AM   #94
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,093
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by kahntrutahn View Post
You left out the SIX 5/10+ games that I played for the last ELEVEN hours.

Cheers,

--
Kahn
To bad they don't have medium or low limit games though don't you think? Especially on a Saturday night? However I'm glad you are happy with the way things are and I think it's great that a handful of players are sticking it out at high limits to keep those games alive. It's a very small pool of the same players multi-tabling though I've noticed. Very small group.

At the mid and low level games you don't find a dedicated group like that. I think they've been raked away long ago.
Synergistic Explosions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 07:55 AM   #95
Minbet Millionaire
 
kahntrutahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Un-official Internet Poker Support
Posts: 4,325
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Synergistic Explosions View Post
However I'm glad you are happy with the way things are and I think it's great that a handful of players are sticking it out at high limits to keep those games alive.

I'm not happy with the way things are, that's why I've been all over this issue helping to bring about change. You know this, as you've been in the internet poker thread. So how you can post such a thing is beyond my comprehension.


--
Kahn
kahntrutahn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 04:04 PM   #96
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
 
CarbonRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,166
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

We are doing everything we can to get these changes enacted as quickly as possible.

No one has actively pushed for this change more than we have, and I am a little annoyed to think that it seems that some players seem to think that we are dragging our feet on this, or somehow are happy with the structure as it currently is.

Ryan
CarbonRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 04:48 PM   #97
Myx
journeyman
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 216
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbonRyan View Post
We are doing everything we can to get these changes enacted as quickly as possible.

No one has actively pushed for this change more than we have, and I am a little annoyed to think that it seems that some players seem to think that we are dragging our feet on this, or somehow are happy with the structure as it currently is.

Ryan

I just want to let you know that I think you and Chris are very reliable and understanding individuals, and do a great job supporting your player base who also are members of 2+2. However, I think why you get the impression that people are a bit annoyed at you is because this is one of the few places where people can express their dissatisfaction with Merge, not Carbon. This makes for a lot of negative feedback and disgruntled posts which is often misdirected or misinterpreted as being directed towards you and Chris, which is definitely not the case for me personally whenever I give any feedback that has to do with the Merge Network as a whole.

Just wanted to chime in so you guys know that you ARE appreciated, and hopefully stay that way with helpful support and response times.
Myx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2012, 04:50 PM   #98
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
 
CarbonRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,166
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myx View Post
I just want to let you know that I think you and Chris are very reliable and understanding individuals, and do a great job supporting your player base who also are members of 2+2. However, I think why you get the impression that people are a bit annoyed at you is because this is one of the few places where people can express their dissatisfaction with Merge, not Carbon. This makes for a lot of negative feedback and disgruntled posts which is often misdirected or misinterpreted as being directed at you and Chris, which is definitely not the case whenever I give any feedback that has to do with the Merge Network as a whole.

Just wanted to chime in so you guys know that you ARE appreciated, and hopefully stay that way with helpful support and response times.
Thanks Myx, we will most definitely continue to offer you guys the best support possible.

Ryan
CarbonRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 10:19 AM   #99
King of the Kiddie Pool
 
nyrugby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Behind the wire
Posts: 2,209
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Any further word on this, I thought Merge approved the changes awhile ago?
nyrugby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 11:56 AM   #100
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
 
CarbonRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,166
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by nyrugby View Post
Any further word on this, I thought Merge approved the changes awhile ago?
We have sent in our recommendations, and Merge have been putting together the new structure. We are just waiting for them to deliver that to us for review.

Our executive team have sent a follow up on this today, so hopefully we should know more in the near future.

We are still pushing to bring this live as soon as possible.

Ryan
CarbonRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 12:46 PM   #101
old hand
 
dmyers1166's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Our puppy Cali!
Posts: 1,336
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbonRyan View Post
We have sent in our recommendations, and Merge have been putting together the new structure. We are just waiting for them to deliver that to us for review.

Our executive team have sent a follow up on this today, so hopefully we should know more in the near future.

We are still pushing to bring this live as soon as possible.

Ryan
Thanks for the update, I know the wheels turn slowly. Try to get this in for the big tournament push in September, maybe the skins can throw a bit of promo stuff in for LHE. It's summer so the games are pretty slow, but once the new rake kicks in give it some love to help bring in a few players.
dmyers1166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 02:20 PM   #102
King of the Kiddie Pool
 
nyrugby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Behind the wire
Posts: 2,209
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Ryan, Thanks for the update and the effort
nyrugby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2012, 03:03 PM   #103
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
 
CarbonRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,166
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

No worries at all guys.

Ryan
CarbonRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 04:30 AM   #104
adept
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,105
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

I'm a limit player and like everyone else I'd like to see a lower rake. Unfortunately a lot of players who think that a lower rake is going to turn them into winning players are going to be sorely dissappointed. Most of the players who blame the rake are actually losing because they just aren't as good as they think they are.

I've gotten into this argument before here at 2plus2. The rake is on the high side but it is definitely beatable. There is also a real lack of understanding in comparing the Merge rake structure to the tiered PokerStars rake structure.

My issue with the Merge network is that it has done nothing to promote LHE games. The promotions that Merge offer seldom even touch upon any of the limit games (Stud included). I think that promoting the games and consequently being able to table (and seat) select (rather than the table or seat selecting me) would have a much bigger impact on my profits than a slightly lower rake.

I also agree that this is a Merge problem, not a Carbon problem. From what I've consistently seen, Chris and Ryan seem to sincerely have the players' best interests at heart.
SantaCruz is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 12:57 PM   #105
old hand
 
dmyers1166's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Our puppy Cali!
Posts: 1,336
Re: CarbonPoker/Merge Fixed Limit Rake Structure Suggestions

Quote:
My issue with the Merge network is that it has done nothing to promote LHE games. The promotions that Merge offer seldom even touch upon any of the limit games (Stud included). I think that promoting the games and consequently being able to table (and seat) select (rather than the table or seat selecting me) would have a much bigger impact on my profits than a slightly lower rake.
Maybe a little out of the thread and once we receive a slight rake decrease, I think it can only be slight as volume is just not there for larger ones. Maybe we can start a thread for promotion ideas on RPM/Carbon.

It is really merge that has to promote some but skins can help and if it gets more players in limit then so much the better. Maybe triple point limit hours, maybe a free roll limit tournament for monthly limit rake. Hopefully programmers for merge can break out limit rake vs BB rake. For those other limiters a HORSE or other game with limit bet structure could be a free roll.

Could Carbon comment on any ideas to promote the limit games. NL has plenty of promotion as it is the main game, a little help our way is appreciated. Also promotions shouldn't be for the grinders give the occasional player the most benefit.
---------------
As for rake doesn't matter, I'll just say on stars, from the beginning I was always +BB/100.

Since those days I most likely play 3x better, and I'm a small -BB/100, games are tougher now but on stars with my skills now I would double my win rate. 3.6BB/100+ rake levels are a big hurdle to overcome. However what you clearly miss is this isn't about us grinders. I win with rakeback, I withdraw and don't deposit. All is good and I could continue, but stop and think the next time your at the table, what about the weak players. They never win they don't have a chance .. they are just raked to death. Give them a small boost and at least the get more entertainment and maybe play a few more months before moving on. Rec players are the life blood at the table. I'm amazed we get the action we do, but the well may well go dry.
dmyers1166 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive