|
|
| CarbonPoker & Aced Sponsored Support forum for Merge Gaming Flagship Brand CarbonPoker.ag and Aced.com |
06-13-2012, 12:13 PM
|
#1066
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 578
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbigg48
I would like to see some deep stack tournies with good structures. Can we at least get a tournament with 15 min blind levels? To me, anything less than that is a turbo.
|
I see several deep stack freezeouts with 15 minute levels. The $1,000 guarantee, $1,750, $2K, the $25K daily high roller, $3K, $500, $6.5K...there's even a couple of dailies with 20 minute levels.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 01:54 PM
|
#1067
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 229
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Quote:
Originally Posted by madcatz1999
I see several deep stack freezeouts with 15 minute levels. The $1,000 guarantee, $1,750, $2K, the $25K daily high roller, $3K, $500, $6.5K...there's even a couple of dailies with 20 minute levels.
|
Ok, thanks Madcatz. I probably need to adjust my lobby filter.
|
|
|
06-13-2012, 04:50 PM
|
#1068
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 5,516
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Uhh I'm pretty sure I had a timebank in $5 super turbos a few days ago. Now my $1 and $2 supers have timebank, but don't have one at $5 or $10 supers??
Btw 30 seconds timebank is too much for a super, it gives grinders excuse to play too many tables and slow it down for all. Make it 15, maybe 10 seconds
|
|
|
06-19-2012, 03:17 PM
|
#1069
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: May 2010
Location: mom's basement
Posts: 3,527
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Can we please make the 18man reg speed sng's start with t1500 instead of t1000 please.
|
|
|
06-20-2012, 02:42 PM
|
#1070
|
|
enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 99
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Everyday there is a $3 Deuce to Seven listed under Satellite that begins at 14:45 my time? What is this a Satellite to?
tourney # 57151133
|
|
|
06-20-2012, 02:44 PM
|
#1071
|
|
enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 99
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyStax
Can we please make the 18man reg speed sng's start with t1500 instead of t1000 please.
|
I have played in several of these and since they start with blinds @ $5-$10, I think 1000 chips are perfect. Just my opinion.
|
|
|
06-21-2012, 11:39 AM
|
#1072
|
|
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,256
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadlygrateful
Everyday there is a $3 Deuce to Seven listed under Satellite that begins at 14:45 my time? What is this a Satellite to?
tourney # 57151133
|
Hmmm, doesn't seem to be a satellite to anything.......perhaps it is just misplaced under the satellite tab.
Ill pass it along to the guys at Merge for review.
Ryan
|
|
|
06-21-2012, 12:06 PM
|
#1073
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 298
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Where are the limit tournys, all this love for other forms of poker, but just a huge lack here, unless im totally missing them, would love something midday and early evening.
|
|
|
06-21-2012, 12:32 PM
|
#1074
|
|
adept
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: macomb, michigan
Posts: 788
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
With all the plumeting guarantees lately, do u think you can make adjustments to starting stacks? Doesn't make much sense for 40-60 man tournaments to run for 5+ hours online. Perfect example is the $60 4k fo at 12(est) that has a 2 hr late reg. bring the starting stack down to 3k. Also wouldn't mind seeing the hr starting stack go from7.5 to 5k.
Just a few examples, but I believe if can adjust the stack sizes (and structure effectively) you'll see and increase in volume, especially at the matinee tournaments. Which are the games that have taken a beating in guarantees and player volume.
|
|
|
06-21-2012, 01:11 PM
|
#1075
|
|
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,256
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivegotstylekid
With all the plumeting guarantees lately, do u think you can make adjustments to starting stacks? Doesn't make much sense for 40-60 man tournaments to run for 5+ hours online. Perfect example is the $60 4k fo at 12(est) that has a 2 hr late reg. bring the starting stack down to 3k. Also wouldn't mind seeing the hr starting stack go from7.5 to 5k.
Just a few examples, but I believe if can adjust the stack sizes (and structure effectively) you'll see and increase in volume, especially at the matinee tournaments. Which are the games that have taken a beating in guarantees and player volume.
|
Makes sense, let me pass this along to Merge
Ryan
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 05:16 AM
|
#1076
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 5,516
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
The $2 180 man is unattractive. A. Buyin is too small 1st is lame, doesn't excite people and it keeps out a lot of people who play higher buyins. B. Compared to the reg speed 180 it's missing 4 or 5 blind levels and you removed the antes!!! Make it a 3.30rebuy so it suits all buyins levels and has a cool 1st place, fix the structure, and observe it's greatness
Please make us all happy and make yourself a little extra change
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 06:04 AM
|
#1077
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 578
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
FWIW, the $2 180-man (and the $4) were one of the most popular games at the old site I played, with a game filling up every few minutes (a site with higher overall traffic). So, there are definitely people that like the format. I don't play them on Merge, though, since I can't get the volume in them that I would want to make them worthwhile.
|
|
|
06-22-2012, 01:14 PM
|
#1078
|
|
Official CarbonPoker Site Representative
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,256
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomoDaK
The $2 180 man is unattractive. A. Buyin is too small 1st is lame, doesn't excite people and it keeps out a lot of people who play higher buyins. B. Compared to the reg speed 180 it's missing 4 or 5 blind levels and you removed the antes!!! Make it a 3.30rebuy so it suits all buyins levels and has a cool 1st place, fix the structure, and observe it's greatness
Please make us all happy and make yourself a little extra change
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by madcatz1999
FWIW, the $2 180-man (and the $4) were one of the most popular games at the old site I played, with a game filling up every few minutes (a site with higher overall traffic). So, there are definitely people that like the format. I don't play them on Merge, though, since I can't get the volume in them that I would want to make them worthwhile.
|
We will pass the feedback along to Merge for them to review.
Ryan
|
|
|
06-23-2012, 02:09 PM
|
#1079
|
|
adept
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 957
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
You shouldn't be allowed to register after the rebuy/add-on period is completed in any tournament. Should be able to see during registration how many players are signed up for a tourney and how many are left without scrolling through the list in the tournament lobby.
|
|
|
06-23-2012, 08:59 PM
|
#1080
|
|
adept
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 957
|
Re: CarbonPoker.ag Tournament Improvement Thread -- Update Post #909
Guarantee should be the first thing listed for all tourneys in the Name column of the main lobby.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.
|