Quote:
Originally Posted by golfetto
,
First Off Plo8 isnt an uncommon form of cash game what so ever. They have been growing rapidly in popularity, espically on the west coast in recent years. YES I actually mean Pot limit omaha hi/low. IM not sure what else you could of thought i was refeering too. Second off, trying to limit a structure too some broke ass version of omaha that allows you to feel comfortable playing on your thin bankroll, and they claim its for the best intention of maintaing the game long term is disingenuine, and down right scrubby! Please dont waste anybodys time by replying to a post by going off on a non related tangent that only serves the purpose of showcaasing your ingorance! I posted on here to elicite the response of players who are seariuos about consistantly playing POL8! Not omaha. If you want to try and get an omaha cash game going, then by allmeans, create your own post and try to generate intrest but DO NOT REPLY TO MY POST UNLESS YOUR SERIOUS!. THANKYOU.
Wow. From the guy with 4 posts. Well **** you too then.
PLO8 is a structure that is not hardly mentioned in the Omaha literature that I've read, and I've never seen it spread here, in AC, or in Vegas. But I've seen plenty of PLO, and O8. Hence "it's a uncommon structure". Fine, maybe it has become really popular at the commerce in LA in the last 2 years or something, but it's a big leap to assume that because of that everyone should expect it to be a household game.
"Broke ass version of omaha"?
Omaha is intended to be played as a post flop game. That means that you need reasonably deep stacks and high SPRs.
Since Pot Limit games scale VERY rapidly, a $2-5 PLO/8 will tend to play as big or bigger than $5-10 NLHE.
Adding a $5 straddle to a $1-2 game gets you back to the $2-5 situation very quickly, without increasing the stack sizes/max buy-in enough to allow players near the max buy in ($300-$500?) to maneuver postflop. With a single raise pre to $15 and two callers you're now at an SPR of < 10 and you've got 2 and a half bets left. You really need a higher buy-in for those spots.
So what are you trying to spread? $1-2-5 with a $500 max buy-in? Or $1000 max?
If you've got enough players to run that game every week, then by all means do it, and good luck with that venture.
But if you'd like to get some of the vast pool of $1-2 players to say "oh, that looks fun, let me try that game" and help feed your game, then it has to play small enough to give them a chance to at least sit down. The same logic applies to drawing the $2-5 NLHE players, of course with a higher tolerance for sitting with $500+.
Call me a scrub if you want, but I've at least
thought about how to structure an Omaha game without it burning out, and given
reasons for why I think that. If there's a problem with my argument, then please point it out. But don't just insult my bankroll and dismiss a potential player for your game.