Quote:
Originally Posted by electrical
I like the whole hand as played.
I assume the question of over-valuing pertains to the starting hand. Sixes, Fours and Nines being live makes Third street worth suffering all the action and from there you hand keeps improving.
There are some lineups where you can raise Fourth and get some folds from the hands falling dead in fear of a jam, but without player reads I think calling and accepting your improvement passively/inexpensively is fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
Isn't 6th a tad MUBSY? Are you worried that 4 seat is going to c/r w/ clubs?
------------------
I'd rather have a live pair to try that 4th street raise. Every time I try it though they all call anyway so I've pretty much given up on it.
Thanks very much for the input so far, guys. electrical, yes, I've been most curious about third street and how comfortable we are generally sticking in capped bets in this spot. My thoughts were the same as what you've identified: all of our key cards for making a straight are live and our hand is generally going to play well multiway especially with a 9 being a disguisedly good card.
Another key thing I was curious about was how strongly to play our hand on 6th once we make a straight. Howard, you're right, I was most worried about clubs (Seat 4), especially with another Q being shown by Seat 2 and the tiny amount of clubs which have appeared elsewhere. I'm still not sure whether the caution in just calling was more +EV than raising and hoping for the best. Given Seat 7's board, I definitely think that a good villain is going to be checking clubs a lot anticipating a good jam spot. I suppose if we take this line, we have to fold if Seat 4 sets up the jam.
Re: potentially raising fourth street, I like the logic, but in practice I've noticed the same as Howard that people just never fold in such spots on this site.
I'm also pretty curious about 7th. Once checked to, is this a mandatory bet?