Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz?

08-23-2015 , 02:56 PM
I was watching a video that said you could limp into a tricky player here, but always raise into a straight forward player. I posted a hand here a few years ago when and old school player, I think Ray Zee, said the play is to raise. It seems like your hand is face up, but you would get more information about your opponent's hand by raising, as well as getting some folds.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-23-2015 , 05:53 PM
What were the dead cards?
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-23-2015 , 07:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Tall
What were the dead cards?
You are implying that you don't mind building the pot if your cards are duplicated and your opponent's up card isn't. So if you had (27)9 or something, it might also be better to limp?
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-23-2015 , 07:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by betgo
You are implying that you don't mind building the pot if your cards are duplicated and your opponent's up card isn't. So if you had (27)9 or something, it might also be better to limp?
I'm saying that Stud analysis needs to be looked at by hand, no two hands are the same, even when the starting three cards are.

A29, with AA2 folded, and 8799 left to act is different from:
A29 UTG with, 334456K left to act.

This is not hold'em where you only have player reads, in Stud games we have more information that we need to process first.

Last edited by Joe Tall; 08-23-2015 at 07:33 PM.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-23-2015 , 07:44 PM
I meant where you had a 9 and 2 wheel cards and there was only one wheel card left to act. In the case in the video, there was only a low card to act and the bringin. If there are multiple players to act with low cards, it is obviously usually a fold, and even if there is another 9 or T to act, that weakens your prospect somewhat.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-23-2015 , 10:12 PM
We are talking about a generic situation with a 9-wheel-wheel and only a wheel as the significant card left to act. Of course you need to look at dead cards.

Both I and the video author know how to play stud games, although I have seen mixed games videos lately by NLHE players who were not good at other games.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-23-2015 , 10:17 PM
I don't play Razz outside of mixed games, but if one un-duplicated wheel upcard is left to play, I would assume it is entirely read dependent. If you have a guy that will fold without a 8 or better under, just raise. If you have a guy that will kick you in the balls until the river with ATC under, let's get ready to gamble. In-between, you have to make a call.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-24-2015 , 12:56 AM
What Joe Tall said and also how in the world do you know that you're raising into a better hand just bec his up card is lower than yours?
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-24-2015 , 02:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
What Joe Tall said and also how in the world do you know that you're raising into a better hand just bec his up card is lower than yours?
Obviously, you don't know it is better. In fact, on average you have the better hand.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-24-2015 , 03:27 AM
Even with bad dead cards we are favorite vs one random hand with low up card without blockers

ProPokerTools Razz Simulation
600,000 trials (Randomized)
dead cards: A2237J
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
45959.58% 357,255429
**640.42% 242,316429

We could limp vs aggro to trap him, but why should we limp otherwise?

Last edited by Fold&Forget; 08-24-2015 at 03:49 AM.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-24-2015 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fold&Forget
Even with bad dead cards we are favorite vs one random hand with low up card without blockers

ProPokerTools Razz Simulation
600,000 trials (Randomized)
dead cards: A2237J
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
45959.58% 357,255429
**640.42% 242,316429

We could limp vs aggro to trap him, but why should we limp otherwise?
I think this is more like the "bad dead card" scenario people are referring to:

ProPokerTools Razz Simulation
600,000 trials (Randomized)
dead cards: A2237J
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
45951.72% 310,252166
**248.28% 289,582166

Also, my advice is to think of your strategy as a line if play here, rather than "what's my best play on 3rd" followed by a bunch of ????? on 4th and 5th. It may help clarify why having a hot/cold equity edge vs. a random range may not be as profitable as you think.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-24-2015 , 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGspecial
Also, my advice is to think of your strategy as a line if play here, rather than "what's my best play on 3rd" followed by a bunch of ????? on 4th and 5th. It may help clarify why having a hot/cold equity edge vs. a random range may not be as profitable as you think.
Yeh, you should play the hand, but it is marginal, because you will make mistakes on later streets from not having any idea what villain has.
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote
08-25-2015 , 03:08 PM
well how many playable hands are there with a 9 in that situation. What does the majority of that range want to do?
Is it OK to limp with 9(wheel-wheel) into a wheel in razz? Quote

      
m