Quote:
Originally Posted by Noobie Newbertson
Obviously the BBJ is bad for serious players (and really, it's bad for all players). People ITT have discussed how awesome it would be if there was no BBJ but it's not going to change anything. Bad beat jackpots are ****ing stupid but dumb people love them and dumb people are obviously the target demographic for casinos.
|
I can speak as someone who won $3280 two weeks ago at the 4/8 table. BBJP's are not poker, they are more like a lottery. I look at poker as a game with the money won/lost being the scoreboard. BBJP's mess it up. While it's easy enough to just not count my jackpot winnings on my 2012 scorecard, my winnings are underrepresented (or losses overrepresented) on every other hand I win anytime they take a jackpot drop.
However stumbling into one has changed my perspective on whether it's good or bad for serious players. Think of the BBJP from you opponents at the tables' perspective. Many of them are very aware of everything about the jackpot. They are at the table hoping to win it. And some of them are doing more than hoping. Those players are sabotaging their poker games to improve their chances. They call way more than they should with a pair (or even a hand like 62s). They stay in with gutshot straight flush draws. But, when they get a big pair (or AKs) they don't want to raise the other players off a potential jackpot.
From your perspective the EV is theoretically 0 (forgetting about taxes, tips, and some games being more likely to hit than others) assuming the other players don't know there is a BBJP (believe it or not one guy at our table had no idea what the commotion was about as the rest of us were all cheering when it hit). But almost all of your opponents do know about it and some alter their games (some by just showing up) because of it.
One suggestion could for Rivers to spread both BBJP tables and non BBJP tables. If they did, does anyone really think the dynamics of the two games would be very similar?