Quote:
Originally Posted by post1958
I'm pretty sure I read Penn National Gaming is in line to manage the Gettyburg casino, if Gettysburg is the site selected.
Oh, well, that kills my idea of competition.
Went down last night, and I was expressing frustration that we couldn't even buy chips at the podium for a long time because they were doing a count. A couple other players and I got a bit huffy with staff, and we ended up having a good conversation with them, because they share the same frustrations. Some of it comes from gaming regs, some of it is the "house" policies, which are decisions made by people way up from them, who aren't in the room.
Some weird rules that are in their book, pointed out to me by a nice older woman who was floating different duties that night:
This one is on the "engraved" rule board at the podium:
The house can raise the stakes on any table at any time.
This is proof that whoever is in charge has no concept that poker is a different animal than blackjack. The floor staff said this rule will never be used. It's laughable. Of course if a whole table of PLAYERS wants to change, that's a different matter.
The other rule she told me lasted "about 24 hours" and is not in the printed list (that I saw) - in a chopped pot with an extra dollar chip, the extra chip went to some sort of rank of suits of the high cards in hand. It is now the standard "closest to the button going left."
I feel a little bit better about the fact that much of the staff there has the same frustrations as the players. I told them "my biggest problem is that the powers that be seem to think that just because legal poker is new here, none of us has ever been in a card room before." Response: "tell me about it." - The ones in the know feel the same way.