Nash calculator says Q7o is a fold here (39.7%, 22+ Ax+ K2s+ K9o+ Q4s+ Q9o+ J6s+ J9o+ T6s+ T9o 96s+ 86s+ 76s)
But I am still thinking bout jamming as it is the very near bubble (everyone tends to play very tight) and BB is a nit!

What do you think?

[converted_hand][hand_history]Poker Stars, $3.19 Buy-in (300/600 blinds, 50 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #37199034

BB: 4,544 (7.6 bb)
UTG+1: 7,496 (12.5 bb)
UTG+2: 4,072 (6.8 bb)
MP1: 5,774 (9.6 bb)
MP2: 4,427 (7.4 bb)
MP3: 6,745 (11.2 bb)
CO: 8,698 (14.5 bb)
Hero (BTN): 7,810 (13 bb)
SB: 17,934 (29.9 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BTN with 7 Q
6 folds, HERO?

It probably says BB should play very nittish anyway. SB tendencies are more important here.

As regards hand strength - look up a table of "power numbers" and look for the patterns. Generally the "second best" card in your hand is more important for pushing - in this case it's an offsuit 7. In the range you posted the second best card has to be an offsuit 9 or better or a suited 6 or higher, or the same rank as the first card (i.e. a pair). Second best cards worse than that need an Ace or suited King to carry them.

Too weak to shove here, we're short but we're not desperate enough to shove Q7o.. even though Nash is saying shove Q9 I still wouldn't shove that either with 13 bigs we can wait for better spots

Yeah now looking at it again, you are right - +SB is fairly loose which mean we have to tighten our shoving range

Are you using ICMIZER?

I haven't bought it yet so can only use it for three hands/day
Defo looking to buy it within the next couple of weeks tho as I need to improve my final table game.

When I said shove tighter, it was simply because SB calls too wide so we have to adjust our shoving range from a nash point of view.

it's pretty bad shove... there can be merits for like 2,4xin/folding in this spot tho