Quote:
Originally Posted by PS Walmsley
My reluctance to add a higher buy-in 180-man rebuy is not because we are averse to re-buys in general. How about a 90-man turbo rebuy instead? The 90-man turbo has the same blind structure as the 180-man turbo. Also, the highest existing 90-man turbo is $1 so there is no existing 90-man tournament that would be affected.
I like it. Personally, I would prefer an 8-11 $ 90-man turbo rebuy instead of an 8-11 $ 180-man turbo rebuy. A 90-man rebuy turbo would offer less variance and shorter average run time per sit and go = can play more of them per day than a 180-man.
Perhaps you could also offer a little lower rake in these 90-man rebuys than the 3.50 180r , since these 90-man rebuys will probably be absolutely filled with regulars.
If it was totally up to me, the prefered buyin would be : 8.80 $. Maybe something like 8.05 + 0.75, 9,3% rake, as opposed to 9,7% in the 3.50 rebuys. With that buyin it's possible that some players would be willing to gamble just a tad more than if the buyin was 10 dollars or over.
And as Curious George already has mentioned, it would be important and very nice if you could put these 90 man rebuys in the lobby, so that they will get good advertisement and therefore fill up fast.
Thank you for listening to us and your will to compromise!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camzace
Even if 90 man liquidity would be lower, just because you need half as many players means they'd run totally fine.
A big +1 for 90man rebuys.
Excactly.
Last edited by TeamTrousers; 03-09-2012 at 07:13 AM.
Reason: merging two posts