Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
.50 180 SNG dealt A7o Co .50 180 SNG dealt A7o Co

08-13-2011 , 11:16 AM
I am just ITM and I seek a good spot to shove. I was glad to see I was dealt A7o from the D. All folded to the CO who ship it ...

    Poker Stars, $4.10 Buy-in (800/1,600 blinds, 150 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #10268382

    MP2: 57,843 (36.2 bb)
    MP3: 70,402 (44 bb)
    CO: 15,278 (9.5 bb)
    Hero (BTN): 9,819 (6.1 bb)
    SB: 19,283 (12.1 bb)
    BB: 11,087 (6.9 bb)
    UTG+1: 38,436 (24 bb)
    UTG+2: 27,261 (17 bb)
    MP1: 20,591 (12.9 bb)

    Preflop: (1,350) Hero is BTN with A 7
    5 folds, CO raises to 15,128 and is all-in, 3 folds

    Spoiler:
    Results: 5,350 pot
    CO mucked and won 5,350 (3,600 net)



    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.



    Should I shove too... I mean, A7 seems not strong enough to call a shove and I intended to go allin when I am first to act with any two...

    Critics...?
    08-13-2011 , 11:45 AM
    Much depends on villain,against most in a $4.5/180,I'd fold it.
    08-13-2011 , 11:54 AM
    Much better to ship any random two cards as a first player to act that call his shove with as little as A7. With no reads it's easy fold, against loose players you might call, but I'll never be happy to do it.
    08-13-2011 , 12:26 PM
    9819 to win 13569 so you need 42% equity. Breakeven is around 18% of hands. If he's shoving wider than 66+,A5s+,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,ATo+,KTo+,QTo+ call and if he's shoving tighter than that range fold.
    08-13-2011 , 12:40 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mflip
    9819 to win 13569 so you need 42% equity. Breakeven is around 18% of hands. If he's shoving wider than 66+,A5s+,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,ATo+,KTo+,QTo+ call and if he's shoving tighter than that range fold.
    Very good that you had time to check it. I think it just confirms what I said, because not too often random is shoving that wide
    08-15-2011 , 04:38 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mflip
    9819 to win 13569 so you need 42% equity. Breakeven is around 18% of hands. If he's shoving wider than 66+,A5s+,K9s+,Q9s+,J9s+,ATo+,KTo+,QTo+ call and if he's shoving tighter than that range fold.
    Which app do you use to get that odds and equity perc. ?
    08-15-2011 , 05:49 AM
    I think its reasonably close against a good player but against most I fold
    08-15-2011 , 06:34 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by 4xTraderVn
    Critics...?
    you have/gave zero reads on villain

    if we have the slightest read that he is competent i instafistpumpcall in this spot.
    08-15-2011 , 11:22 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mhnds
    Which app do you use to get that odds and equity perc. ?
    Pokerstove and a calculator.
    08-15-2011 , 05:37 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by furo
    you have/gave zero reads on villain

    if we have the slightest read that he is competent i instafistpumpcall in this spot.
    +1, even breakeven regs should be jamming wide enough that getting A7o in here is +cEV
    08-16-2011 , 09:15 AM
    yeah but a7 is at the bottom of the shoving range
    esp on final table in those nitty 180s 4
    08-16-2011 , 09:40 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mflip
    Pokerstove and a calculator.
    +1, i use the same high tech

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by furo
    if we have the slightest read that he is competent i instafistpumpcall in this spot.
    +1, imo against competent player insta call, against random fold... reg should shove here really wide range
    08-16-2011 , 12:44 PM
    close but against a ramdom i would fold. you still have alot of FE, ex when you shove against 10-13bb stacks.
    08-16-2011 , 12:58 PM
    Yeah prob fold this against a random in 4.50

    Snap calling in a 2 obv
    08-16-2011 , 05:16 PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Abe008
    Yeah prob fold this against a random in 4.50

    Snap calling in a 2 obv
    Why are randoms more likely to be shoving more correctly in lower limits? If anything this should be more of a fold in a 2
    08-17-2011 , 08:28 AM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Camzace
    Why are randoms more likely to be shoving more correctly in lower limits? If anything this should be more of a fold in a 2
    In my experience,regs and randoms both shove way tighter in non turbo $4/180s than in turbo $2s.Haven't played a nonturbo in a long time though.

          
    m