PokerStars - $3.19+$0.31|200/400 Ante 50 NL - Holdem - 9 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

MP: 3,610 (VPIP: 14.58, PFR: 12.95, 3Bet Preflop: 7.52, Hands: 1,261)
MP+1: 4,965 (VPIP: 15.48, PFR: 15.07, 3Bet Preflop: 2.11, Hands: 409)
MP+2: 16,282 (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)
CO: 5,035 (VPIP: 20.73, PFR: 16.89, 3Bet Preflop: 12.77, Hands: 165)
BTN: 9,536 (VPIP: 100.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 1)
Hero (SB): 8,140
BB: 15,688 (VPIP: 11.41, PFR: 8.61, 3Bet Preflop: 4.89, Hands: 891)
UTG: 4,300 (VPIP: 16.85, PFR: 13.16, 3Bet Preflop: 6.83, Hands: 468)
UTG+1: 5,965 (VPIP: 17.72, PFR: 14.90, 3Bet Preflop: 8.81, Hands: 510)

9 players post ante of 50, Hero posts SB 200, BB posts BB 400

Pre Flop: (pot: 1,050) Hero has Q J

fold, fold, MP raises to 3,560 and is all-in, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 8,090 and is all-in, fold

I believe it is profitable iso. There is few reasons:

1)According to Nash, the reg should be shoving 24% of the range ( i believe he is wider). So, your hand should be doing fine against this range.

2) you still have left 10bb after a loss, but if you manage to win you will have 30bb.

Personally, i take this spot.

i agree that is a profitable iso vs reg, but i would skip this spot with 20bb stack... i don't like to get down to 10bb and lose the chance to open/fold and 3b light... would call with 6-8bb and >33-35bb..

you are burning money with this shove

This,

Probably less than 50/50 on winning this hand also down to last place at table if you lose from solid 3rd place

Fold. is he really shoving wider than 24% into 6 bigger stacks? I know QJs is very pretty, but often the pretty ones are higher-maintenance than is worth it.

this is definitely +ev shove here. good reg will be wide here, however i think petar is spot on when he says that with less then 10bbs we should take this and with closer to 30bbs take this spot.