hi guys this is a very interesting spot..i dont know whice is better decision shove than raise-call for value..i m really dont know. so what do you believe is the best decision? except of the result thank guys have fun
CO: 2,789 (23.2 bb)
Hero (BTN): 1,433 (11.9 bb)
SB: 4,549 (37.9 bb)
BB: 1,380 (11.5 bb)
MP1: 3,542 (29.5 bb)
MP2: 2,029 (16.9 bb)
MP3: 1,535 (12.8 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BTN with Q A
4 folds, Hero raises to 246, SB folds, BB raises to 1,365 and is all-in, Hero calls 1,119

Flop: (2,895) K 5 9 (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: (2,895) 9 (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: (2,895) 4 (2 players, 1 is all-in)

[/hand_history][/converted_hand]

If the BB is aggro player and you can expect him to resteal more than not, i like standard open raise and call ofc, otherwise i prefer to just jam the BTNs in these situations.

I would jam into tight players as they might call me with some weaker Ax but they dont 3bet frequently.

Into some normal players /aggresive / regs id mraise call

No reason to include the results in your post, even in spoilers. It's pointless if you were readless at the time. It will either have no impact or will mean opinions are skewed.

Anyway, it's fine - the result does seem to confirm this, and of course don't focus on the fact that you lost. Focus on the fact that you're playing readless (?) at micro stakes against plenty of bad players with a strong hand in late position. Unless you're playing with very specific reads or game flow considerations this seems like a fine way to play it and without more info. it seems like you might lose too much value by open jamming. Both are profitable but I like your line.

[QUOTE=AMT;49313031]No reason to include the results in your post, even in spoilers. It's pointless if you were readless at the time. It will either have no impact or will mean opinions are skewed.

Anyway, it's fine - the result does seem to confirm this, and of course don't focus on the fact that you lost. Focus on the fact that you're playing readless (?) at micro stakes against plenty of bad players with a strong hand in late position. Unless you're playing with very specific reads or game flow considerations this seems like a fine way to play it and without more info. it seems like you might lose too much value by open jamming. Both are profitable but I like your line.[/QUOTE
you have right

thank you guyss