What a nit this winning reg is

cause open jamming 44 there is profitable......

Right, any pair is profitable in that spot, especially when people are folding 77 in the SB to the jam :P.

so your saying you have no edge? and feel you need to take every flip that you can.

So you're saying you're able to calculate your edge in a way that makes 22 a fold in that spot? You either overrate your edge or are just misreading the hand here. +cev lines, being a shove or a call, are never a flip. A flip is neutral ev.

You are over estimating a regs range here. 66+ KQ+ is a good solid range here. lets see you beat 66, everything else you are a dog to or a flip. If you enjoy variance call....

66+ KQ+ is a godawful range here. No good reg should ever be this tight. I would be amazed if a reg is not at least jamming 22+, suited broadways and suited aces in this spot. If he isn't then that's his leak really. I'm not advising anyone to even call light in the spot. 77 is just a really good hand here. I don't understand at all the reasoning for folding. I fail to realise how variance should affect any decision we make, ever, in 180s. One of us is just dead wrong.

Nash shows the following range for UTG:

17.6%, 22+ A8s+ A5s ATo+ K9s+ KJo+ Q9s+ QJo J9s+ T9s 98s

so in reality people should push 20%+ in this spot since almost nobody calls as wide as he should according to Nash. But as we can see in this thread many regs shove way tighter so I would personally fold the 77 without knowing more about the specific reg.

+1.
Only calling a reg who I've got marked as being wide.

So thats ur range UTG here?

Yes it is. Maybe other stuff too.

+1 to good reg's range should be way wider than suggested itt.

he shoves here 22+ for sure, call

fold. -ev as worst case 88+ and AQ+. at the best it's a flip. just like one of the posts above mentioned.

fold