Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > >

Notices

MTTSNG Discussion and analysis of MTTSNGs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-12-2017, 03:57 PM   #1
Captain-Hindsight
journeyman
 
Captain-Hindsight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 248
180m 22 @ FT

    Poker Stars, $2.28 Buy-in (1,250/2,500 blinds, 250 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 5 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #37724541

    MP: 83,164 (33.3 bb)
    CO: 24,014 (9.6 bb)
    Hero (BTN): 75,133 (30.1 bb)
    SB: 35,833 (14.3 bb)
    BB: 51,856 (20.7 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BTN with 2 2
    2 folds, Hero raises to 5,000, SB folds, BB calls 2,500

    Flop: (12,500) 4 T J (2 players)
    BB checks, Hero bets 4,375, BB calls 4,375

    Turn: (21,250) 9 (2 players)
    BB bets 10,413, Hero folds

    Spoiler:



    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.


    SB was unfamiliar and BB is a break even or losing reg, little bit spashy.

    Plan was to fold if SB or BB rr. I think I fire a small c bet on most flops here. another idea is to check back and if checked to OTT fire a delayed c bet there. any thoughts?
    Captain-Hindsight is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-12-2017, 03:58 PM   #2
    Captain-Hindsight
    journeyman
     
    Captain-Hindsight's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Feb 2017
    Posts: 248
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    1. 123
    2. 82
    3. 46
    4. 30
    5. 24
    Captain-Hindsight is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-12-2017, 04:37 PM   #3
    Leia Amidala
    grinder
     
    Join Date: Nov 2015
    Posts: 414
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    i wouldnt cbet this board often. it connects well with his flatting range. almost all the BW now have either a pair or some sort of draw. If you do cbet i think you should barrel alot of turns, and potential rivers as well. (cause his ICM point of view is gross).

    Last edited by Leia Amidala; 05-12-2017 at 04:48 PM.
    Leia Amidala is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-12-2017, 06:06 PM   #4
    2MuchLuckWillKillU
    enthusiast
     
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Posts: 96
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    shove preflop , minraising is the worst option imo .
    2MuchLuckWillKillU is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-13-2017, 03:33 AM   #5
    Rodream8
    enthusiast
     
    Join Date: Apr 2017
    Location: Romania
    Posts: 74
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Leia Amidala View Post
    i wouldnt cbet this board often. it connects well with his flatting range. almost all the BW now have either a pair or some sort of draw. If you do cbet i think you should barrel alot of turns, and potential rivers as well. (cause his ICM point of view is gross).
    +1, this flop texture hits his range hard, and wanna go check flop and c-bet turn or maybe river.
    Jamming here is a good ideea because u put a lot of presure on your opponets on the FT.
    And if u do miniraise , make the sizing a little higher something like 2.50, 2,75.

    Last edited by Rodream8; 05-13-2017 at 03:35 AM. Reason: forgot some words to write.
    Rodream8 is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-13-2017, 04:04 AM   #6
    Captain-Hindsight
    journeyman
     
    Captain-Hindsight's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Feb 2017
    Posts: 248
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    Totally agree on the delayed c-bet.

    shoving 30bb seems laughably bad. Ran an icm and got 55+ but even then we have better options available to us than just shoving everything
    Captain-Hindsight is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-13-2017, 07:50 AM   #7
    2MuchLuckWillKillU
    enthusiast
     
    Join Date: Nov 2010
    Posts: 96
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    do you understand the concept of effective stack sizes ?

    shoving 22 here prints money , you probably forgot to adjust their calling ranges which should be around 9% for the sb and 7% for the bb .

    if you use chipev calling ranges then your icm shoving ranges are completely skewed and become ultra tight .
    2MuchLuckWillKillU is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-13-2017, 01:35 PM   #8
    Captain-Hindsight
    journeyman
     
    Captain-Hindsight's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Feb 2017
    Posts: 248
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    yes I understand what effective stack size is

    i was tripped up looking at MP and CO

    gotcha shove /thread
    Captain-Hindsight is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 05-15-2017, 08:12 PM   #9
    oldskool87
    adept
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: Toronto
    Posts: 794
    Re: 180m 22 @ FT

    unless the blinds are super aggro i have no problem m/r. shoving is also fine but its not like you need to shove
    oldskool87 is offline   Reply With Quote

    Reply
          

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off


    Forum Jump


    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:29 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin®
    Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.33 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
    Copyright ę 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive
     
     
    Poker Players - Streaming Live Online