Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Tournament Poker > MTTSNG

Notices

MTTSNG Discussion and analysis of MTTSNGs.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-16-2012, 08:49 AM   #16
journeyman
 
wackyradish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: GM-City
Posts: 388
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

icm fold ainec
wackyradish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 11:17 AM   #17
old hand
 
oNste's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia/Micro stakes Stars tab
Posts: 1,740
Is BB opening a lot of hands?
oNste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 02:59 PM   #18
adept
 
Aliquantum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,099
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Quote:
Originally Posted by wackyradish View Post
icm fold ainec
What ranges do you give villains? I think it is close assuming any reasonable calling ranges.
Aliquantum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 06:22 PM   #19
centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 186
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliquantum View Post
What ranges do you give villains? I think it is close assuming any reasonable calling ranges.
Quote:
What range are u shoving here against big stacks? Both Big stacks were more on loose side.
I think something like 22+ A7s+ A8o+ KTs+ KTo+ QTs+ QJo JTs maybe more considering the reads given by hero. But maybe its where im wrong, maybe they are tighter than that but i would be suprised. I really think they call looser(especially the bb). Anyway vs that range its a fold i think.
fish_but_lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 08:01 PM   #20
newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 15
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

This is actually a shove if one of these people is playing like a nitball retard, or if both of them are calling too tightly.

Given 2 wide calling ranges though, my voodoo wizardry tells me to shove something like 55+ ATo+ A8s KQs in this spot, pretty big icm disaster when you get called here. You can probably add 4 or 5 hands to that or something and it won't be awful.
acrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 08:41 PM   #21
adept
 
Aliquantum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,099
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish_but_lucky View Post
I think something like 22+ A7s+ A8o+ KTs+ KTo+ QTs+ QJo JTs maybe more considering the reads given by hero. But maybe its where im wrong, maybe they are tighter than that but i would be suprised. I really think they call looser(especially the bb). Anyway vs that range its a fold i think.
If they are both calling that range, it is very very close in terms of $EV. And with 6bb, i'll take a breakevenish $EV play all day.
Aliquantum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 10:01 PM   #22
centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 186
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliquantum View Post
If they are both calling that range, it is very very close in terms of $EV. And with 6bb, i'll take a breakevenish $EV play all day.
why? personally, im more likely to take breakevenish $EV play when there's no small stack(about to be hit by the blind) than where there is.
explain me why it can be right but i dont understand
fish_but_lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2012, 11:35 PM   #23
adept
 
Aliquantum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,099
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Well I tend to think that playing 100% according to ICM is a mistake so my opinion might be biased.

But also, there's a very real possibility that the shorty doubles up next hand and then we eat the blind and all of a sudden the roles are reversed, you have no FE, and you folded A3s OTB 2 hands earlier. ICM/SNG Wiz looks at each hand in a vacuum and doesn't account for future hands.

Point is though, I think its a really close spot, not a "snap" fold or shove. And because its such a meh spot, either option isn't a big mistake.
Aliquantum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 02:57 AM   #24
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: They see my trollin', they hatin'
Posts: 3,655
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

limp
Pghfan987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 09:47 PM   #25
centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 186
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aliquantum View Post
Well I tend to think that playing 100% according to ICM is a mistake so my opinion might be biased.
But also, there's a very real possibility that the shorty doubles up next hand and then we eat the blind and all of a sudden the roles are reversed, you have no FE, and you folded A3s OTB 2 hands earlier. ICM/SNG Wiz looks at each hand in a vacuum and doesn't account for future hands.
Point is though, I think its a really close spot, not a "snap" fold or shove. And because its such a meh spot, either option isn't a big mistake.
what would be your pushing range?
fish_but_lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 11:04 PM   #26
Pooh-Bah
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: They see my trollin', they hatin'
Posts: 3,655
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

lol. seriously. limp.

Maybe someone more ambitious than me can get out their calculators and show how the $ev changes when we limp, SB folds, BB jams, we fold. Or what happens to our $ev when we limp, SB jams, BB jams, and we call. Or when we limp, SB completes, BB jams, and we fold. Or when we limp, the SB completes, the BB checks, and the flop comes 4s7sJd.

I'm way too lazy to figure all that out. But limping is the right answer.
Pghfan987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2012, 11:10 PM   #27
adept
 
Aliquantum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,099
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

Quote:
Originally Posted by fish_but_lucky View Post
what would be your pushing range?
22+, A5+, A2s+, KT+, K9s+, QT+, Q9s+, JT, J9s+, T8s+, 98s+. 25%ish I guess.

The bottom of that range might be slightly -$EV, but given my reasons above, I'm OK with that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post
lol. seriously. limp.

....

I'm way too lazy to figure all that out.
Me too.
Aliquantum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2012, 06:12 AM   #28
deviation of equilibrium
 
furo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,370
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

surprised that noone flats here
pretty good spot for it.
with this stacksize and your handstrength every option is close anyway.
furo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2012, 09:54 AM   #29
centurion
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 186
Re: 180-man 2.5$ A3s ICM

flatting is better than shoving imo. But yeah its close anyway
fish_but_lucky is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive