Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Withdraw Cancelled because of Transfer Despite Thousands in Rake Withdraw Cancelled because of Transfer Despite Thousands in Rake

04-21-2013 , 01:53 PM
How can you possibly say you have been getting on top of cashouts?

Cashout have been taking longer.

I have a friend munch_kin who has just received a cashout after >120 days!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Munch_kin
Max Skrill received today.
Requested 24th December.

~120 days.

Then there are all the guys below who received a cashout this week.

79 days is getting better is it?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jah Onion
Max skrill requested Jan 30th
Received today
79 days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbfreak
i got 1300 to neteller. after 52 days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stake Monster
Received 4k on Skrill today, cashout requested on Jan 24th
Quote:
Originally Posted by supergut
$1200 skrill requested, received today..........63days
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshin
Skrill recived today after 82 days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by norfair18
Sent email. Waiting on 10k max skrill since Feb 25, approaching 2 months.
Quote:
Originally Posted by schlep
Any way to know when the next batch will be? Req. Feb 21st skrill.
04-21-2013 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
Do you want to post the total value of transfers you received? I have the number here in front of me and when I compare that to your rake amount I can see why your cashout was included in those that were cancelled.

I haven't been told that the decisions aren't final, I have just been asked to get all players to contact security directly with any enquires about this.

Outgoing transfers>>>incoming.


Yours likely goes back further but:


Last edited by thejuggernaut; 04-21-2013 at 02:00 PM. Reason: its obv more than I do on stars/ipoker etc but im managing my exposure a bit
04-21-2013 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMD
How can you possibly say you have been getting on top of cashouts?

Cashout have been taking longer.

I have a friend munch_kin who has just received a cashout after >120 days!



Then there are all the guys below who received a cashout this week.

79 days is getting better is it?????
The recent cashouts have been going out much faster, and the people who you listed were all the older cashouts that were being cleared away.

Ive heard of Neteller cashouts in under a week recently, moving forward any remaining old cashouts will be cleared and we can focus entirely on speeding up the cashouts as they come in and not dealing with clearing a backlog at the same time.
04-21-2013 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
Actually by getting rid of these guys and getting back on top of cashouts as we have been we can return the value of Lock funds in the trading market to a sensible value.
Wrong, by doing this you now create less demand for Lock funds on the P2P market. Now even less people will be interested Lock money based on that fact that they are essentially buying bonus money that needs to be earned to be withdrawn upon.

You are attempting to bilge a ship that is destined to sink. By differing this guys cash out and others like him you speed up the perceived speed of cash-outs, but your books still hold the same amount of debt. This is all the time I have to waste arguing with your corrupted soul today.
04-21-2013 , 02:02 PM
@MMD I think the only way to see if cashout times improve is by gauging the time period verse new cashouts within the last month or so. Yikes, surely they're better than 120 days!
04-21-2013 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LivingOffZSun
In b4 Lock funds are trading at 25 cents to the dollar.
wow, those guys have to be stopped... don't you think they're taking advantage of the sellers a bit?

the people selling at 25 cents on the dollar would be crazy or stupid. That's just insane.
04-21-2013 , 02:24 PM
so sad how poker rooms abuse players like this, and there is nothing we can do (who regulates poker rooms after all)
04-21-2013 , 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
Do you want to post the total value of transfers you received?
Why should his total transfers matter here? He's clearly played enough to meet the play through req for this 10k cashout. Are you saying if he receives 50k he can't cashout any of it out till he meets the play through req on ALL of it?
04-21-2013 , 02:33 PM
Not to mention he has won $20k during this time.

So players are now not allowed to cashout winnings.
04-21-2013 , 02:34 PM
I think you might/are likely looking at the wrong account Shane.

Pasted xfer history above also so likely not hard to see, but email starts with "St" if that helps.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TomoDaK
Why should his total transfers matter here? He's clearly played enough to meet the play through req for this 10k cashout. Are you saying if he receives 50k he can't cashout any of it out till he meets the play through req on ALL of it?
Also this.
04-21-2013 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ishipkq
so sad how poker rooms abuse players like this, and there is nothing we can do (who regulates poker rooms after all)
I think the "abuse" happens because there are people who make a business out of player transfers when they're supposed to be using it to play and don't play at all.
04-21-2013 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomoDaK
Why should his total transfers matter here? He's clearly played enough to meet the play through req for this 10k cashout. Are you saying if he receives 50k he can't cashout any of it out till he meets the play through req on ALL of it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMD
Not to mention he has won $20k during this time.

So players are now not allowed to cashout winnings.
Because his total transfers amount implies involvement in the situation we uncovered.

Its not like he received 50K raked 2K and tried to cashout 10K.

The amount he received was mid six figures.


Quote:
Originally Posted by thejuggernaut
I think you might/are likely looking at the wrong account Shane.

Pasted xfer history above also so likely not hard to see, but email starts with "St" if that helps.




Also this.
Im looking the details of the account you sent me previously asking for help with your cashout.
04-21-2013 , 02:44 PM
well its good to know that you at least see emails, even if you dont respond or do anything about them
04-21-2013 , 02:58 PM
this has to be one of the biggest bs non sense making story ever shane. I mean even on crack nothing you have said explains this. lmao make him play thru 6 figures before he cash out is that what your saying. I mean just say look we have cash flow problems and now have to cut off this way of getting money off for players. I mean you know , I know he knows you cant have row cashing out and your just cutting off p2p so players cant get there money off cause your almost broke. say it say it I know you want to. I mean obv you changed tos if you could before but not now.
04-21-2013 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by champstone
this has to be one of the biggest bs non sense making story ever shane. I mean even on crack nothing you have said explains this. lmao make him play thru 6 figures before he cash out is that what your saying. I mean just say look we have cash flow problems and now have to cut off this way of getting money off for players. I mean you know , I know he knows you cant have row cashing out and your just cutting off p2p so players cant get there money off cause your almost broke. say it say it I know you want to.
We have no problem with players transferring funds, but a few players have been abusing the system causing this crackdown.

The transfer of funds system is in place to assist players wanting to get funds into their accounts, a by product of this is players have the ability to sell funds off to cashout as well.

These players for the most part had zero interest in playing in any manner, they were treating Lock Poker as a trading exchange and to increase their profits they worked together to drive down the value of Lock funds.
04-21-2013 , 03:07 PM
@shane

so, a player who is receiving player transfers should know that there is a play through rate before they can cash it out?

and would it make sense that they should regulate the amount of money they receive, because they know they couldn't meet the minimum play through rate?
04-21-2013 , 03:10 PM
How did they drive down the price, more buyers = higher price, less buyers = lower price.
04-21-2013 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonSwanLeon
@shane

so, a player who is receiving player transfers should know that there is a play through rate before they can cash it out?

and would it make sense that they should regulate the amount of money they receive, because they know they couldn't meet the minimum play through rate?
Yes. The bottom line is they should be buying funds to play, if they want to trade in futures then they should join a futures exchange.
04-21-2013 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
We have no problem with players transferring funds, but a few players have been abusing the system causing this crackdown.

The transfer of funds system is in place to assist players wanting to get funds into their accounts, a by product of this is players have the ability to sell funds off to cashout as well.

These players for the most part had zero interest in playing in any manner, they were treating Lock Poker as a trading exchange and to increase their profits they worked together to drive down the value of Lock funds.
I can believe some parts of that. I can believe maybe some skins helped cash out row fast to exploit this . but if you had players funds and paid out on time this would be a non issue. plus I wonder if lock would now select some wink ppl for kick back to buy up now at even less price. I have trust problem here.
04-21-2013 , 03:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
Because his total transfers amount implies involvement in the situation we uncovered.

Its not like he received 50K raked 2K and tried to cashout 10K.

The amount he received was mid six figures.

This is 100% bs Shane.




Net incoming in 2013 is far less than 50k, total incoming is not 6-figures even, and I am trying to cash out less than total profit on the year.



Edit: Once again, I posted my transfer history above.

Last edited by thejuggernaut; 04-21-2013 at 03:34 PM.
04-21-2013 , 03:28 PM
Anyone have an idea of when they implemented this policy?
04-21-2013 , 03:29 PM
Also, OP, when did you attempt your withdrawal and how long did it take to get that email?
04-21-2013 , 03:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpar1
Also, OP, when did you attempt your withdrawal and how long did it take to get that email?
Looking now it was requested just under a month ago, received the email today.
04-21-2013 , 03:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thejuggernaut
This is 100% bs Shane.




Net incoming in 2013 is far less than 50k, total incoming is not 6-figures even, and I am trying to cash out less than total profit on the year.



Edit: Once again, I posted my transfer history above.
Houston will have a problem.
04-21-2013 , 03:40 PM
Shane hows the network doing financially lately? better or worst than 6 months ago?

      
m