In reply to my other post. The numbers are not even close to being accurate. Btn maybe win 10-20% of showdown regularly and why should aggression factor have any direct relation to how a flop comes?
In reply to my other post. The numbers are not even close to being accurate. Btn maybe win 10-20% of showdown regularly and why should aggression factor have any direct relation to how a flop comes?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LTT777
Let me get this straight. The player who always has position wins a majority of the pots they play and the player in the worst position the table loses a majority of the pots he pays? Also the more aggressive player wins the pot a majority of the time? This leads you believe it is rigged? I thought playing in position and using tactful aggression were considered fundamentals because they made players lose more
I'm sorry you are running as poorly as you are, but you'll need to make a stronger case than good poker wins more pots if you want to be taken seriously.
@LTT77
You did not understand what I wrote. The button and small blind did not win or lose the hand by playing better or worse. They had the best hand or worst hand at SHOWDOWN. For players who do not know what showdown means you can read the rules of the game.
http://poker.about.com/od/poker101/ht/holdem101.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by poguemahone1
I'm not saying it's "rigged", but I have never seen so many disgusting beats at incredible times on any site that I've played on since 2004.
As someone mentioned, I felt like I was playing against the RNG. It was constant and consistent 2 and 3 outers. Under pairs hitting sets and A-Rag hitting the rag vs a higher ace or hitting the ace vs a pair.
KK was an absolute nightmare to get dealt and the only way I could win with it was either vs AA or if everyone folded.
It wasn't just happening to me, it was happening to everyone at my tables.
I'm not saying it's rigged, but the site is just not for me.
i have over 1,000,000 hand samples on Intertops poker which is on the Revolution Network (same network as Lock) and I am ranked 8th overall on the site. After multi tabling 20-30 tables, 8 hours a day I can tell you this site is rigged and the RCG is not random at all. After cashing out $20,000 in May of 2012 I have been unable to produce a winning month. I am over 100 BI under EV. If someone saw my profit graph compared to my EV graph that would be evidence alone of the legitimacy of this software. After losing about a steady $1000-$3000 a month (even after making over $3,000 a month just in rakeback and leaderboard money), I decided I had enough. I asked my brother who is a programmer getting his doc at UNH right now to help me and he got some buddies and looked over some stats using HEM2 and another program they created. Here are some statistics that make no sense. I took a small sample of 100,000 hands and these are the results. Btn wins 65% of time when 2 or more hands go to showdown. SB lost 68% of time on the same token. When measuring aggression factor we took a smaller sample of 10,000ish hands. Aggressor of the hand (player who raises preflop either 3-bet, 4bet whoever put in last bet) won SEVENTY EIGHT PERCENT of Pots. Not all of these went to showdown but 78? Is this random? There are many other stats I have I am not sharing because we are trying to come up with some way to get a lawsuit together if possible which it is probably not because of how protected these people are. However if anyone is interested you can email me at
dayyuuuumx3@aim.com. I have had better results on the merge network and have made the full switch in the last month. GL at the tables although luck has nothing to do with it. ( Also when button shove with Ace rag and gets called by any bigger ace the dominated Ace won 80% of time). Math make sense there?
Last edited by Mike Haven; 01-04-2013 at 05:23 AM.
Reason: 4 posts merged