Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Lockpoker accusing me of chipdumping after waiting 2 months for withdrawal. Lockpoker accusing me of chipdumping after waiting 2 months for withdrawal.

07-03-2013 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
They are saying we had used the same internet in the past not for the actually allegation I believe, though Lock poker make their words vague and unclear so Im not sure what they are averting to.

I am really confused on there end as to how they say that we both used the same computer. That doesnt even make sense in my eyes. I let noone use this computer as this is only for poker purposes.

All I have is the information I know and got presented.
I play poker in Thailand from a laptop and live in a serviced appartment. What more can I tell you?

All of what Ive said is true.
They didn't say that someone else used your computer. Go back and read it again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bictor Vlom
Cmon Man! This is lame. See this is why you aren't going to get your money. You keep screwing this whole thing up. I was going to do you a solid and help you out, but you just put your foot in your mouth again. Now, I can't help you DUCY ........................................
BackBlood, I also tried to help you, but your mind was closed, and it still is. You should have approached them honestly and straightforwardly, but now that ship has probably sailed.

Anyway, it's not a big deal, because it's likely play money anyway. But do learn the life lesson. You'll need to be honest with yourself.
07-04-2013 , 12:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frommagio
But do learn the life lesson. You'll need to be honest with yourself.
Or when you are involved in cyber-shenanigans, use different computers from different locations!!!!

Last edited by Bictor Vlom; 07-04-2013 at 12:39 AM. Reason: backblood is a dumba$$
07-04-2013 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
Lock poker are saying that but I never let anyone use my computer so its BS on my end.
They have shown no proof either of this.

It is possible that this Barack0maha was using the same internet. I live in a serviced appartment with shared internet which I use regularly, and I know lots of poker players live here who also use it sometimes.
But if you do not know Barak0maha, how do you know if it "is possible that this
Barack0maha
was using the same internet"? Given that you do not know him.

The term 'this Barack0maha" is an interesting choice of words. DUCY?

Last edited by Bictor Vlom; 07-04-2013 at 12:37 PM. Reason: BackBlood should have consulted me about this.....
07-04-2013 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
I play poker in Thailand from a laptop and live in a serviced appartment. What more can I tell you?
You can tell us that if you ever get your money, you'll use it to upgrade to a sick house.
07-04-2013 , 01:59 PM
Let me guys ask you questions:

If I stayed at the hilton hotels and used their internet there.
Their internet is provided wirelessly and goes through a router on the same floor or floor above/below. 1 or more persons will be using it right?

Those persons would have been using the same internet right?

Even if person 1 only uses that internet on day 1 - never uses it again, then person 2 uses it on day 2 (person 2 who never used it proir to day 1). That would be classed as using the same internet right?
07-04-2013 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
They didn't say that someone else used your computer. Go back and read it again.
Quote:
..............has shared the same computer as you in the past
What are they referring to.
Sound awfully like that he has used my computer in the past. Its basically saying he has logged into my computer with his lock poker account?

I call bull**** on that.
07-04-2013 , 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
Let me guys ask you questions:

If I stayed at the hilton hotels and used their internet there.
Their internet is provided wirelessly and goes through a router on the same floor or floor above/below. 1 or more persons will be using it right?

Those persons would have been using the same internet right?

Even if person 1 only uses that internet on day 1 - never uses it again, then person 2 uses it on day 2 (person 2 who never used it proir to day 1). That would be classed as using the same internet right?
Okay let recap, as you keep avoiding the obvious:

- You play poker
- BO plays poker
- You live in Thailand
- BO lives in Thailand
-You live in an apartment complex
- BO lives(or visits) the same complex
- You played BO and lost from an IP address at one time
- BO won from you from the same IP address at the same time
- You lost 3 buy ins to him in 130 hands
- He won 3 buy ins from you in 130 hands
- You "allegedly" (and poorly) chip dumped to him
- Lock questioned your chip dump and your “relationship” to him and your response was:

Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
What does that even mean. My relationship with him? I play poker on a site and played with him.
- Lock is a scummy company that does not want to pay customers
- Lock is a scummy company and will use the chip dump excuse not to pay you
- You have no leverage over Lock
- Lock knows you have no leverage over them
- Lock will not pay you
- You are screwed

Now, I could probably help you get out of this mess with your $. But because you continue to insult my intelligence (and others) with these feeble denials, I will NOT.
Right now, Lock has your money and does not have to prove anything. And there is no regulator or authorities that will get your money back for you. And as the days wind down, the odds are Lock shuts down and you get zero. Poorly played hand. Well, at least there are lots of whores in Thailand......
07-04-2013 , 03:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
Let me guys ask you questions:

If I stayed at the hilton hotels and used their internet there.
Their internet is provided wirelessly and goes through a router on the same floor or floor above/below. 1 or more persons will be using it right?

Those persons would have been using the same internet right?

Even if person 1 only uses that internet on day 1 - never uses it again, then person 2 uses it on day 2 (person 2 who never used it proir to day 1). That would be classed as using the same internet right?
For this reason IP address alone isnt used for investigating these cases.
07-04-2013 , 08:46 PM
Quite interesting thread, as you can't know for sure who's a liar, who's telling the truth, and who is just trolling... Everyone in this thread seem to be on a different level.

I wonder if shane here is the one replying to all Lock mails no matter which "Department"... wouldn't surprise me.

The mails from all the departments/contacts here seem to be either written to be deliberately confusing , because they perhaps have something to hide, or if not, the company must be run by mentally challenged people, and as they can't seem to not mess anything up, there still probably isn't any money left.

I hope I'm wrong and that everyone gets paid. I think your chance to win the lotto is greather though.

Wonder if there will be an American Greeed episode in the future about some online poker scammer site, and how they kept the lies coming, and how people kept depositing even with all the lies, and how everyone got f*cked in the end. (Standard plot)
07-05-2013 , 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
Let me guys ask you questions:

If I stayed at the hilton hotels and used their internet there.
Their internet is provided wirelessly and goes through a router on the same floor or floor above/below. 1 or more persons will be using it right?

Those persons would have been using the same internet right?

Even if person 1 only uses that internet on day 1 - never uses it again, then person 2 uses it on day 2 (person 2 who never used it proir to day 1). That would be classed as using the same internet right?
Are you saying that you and Barack played from the same Hilton?
07-05-2013 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
Quote:
They didn't say that someone else used your computer. Go back and read it again.
Quote:
..............has shared the same computer as you in the past What are they referring to.
Sound awfully like that he has used my computer in the past. Its basically saying he has logged into my computer with his lock poker account?

I call bull**** on that.
Read it again my friend. You are misunderstanding the evidence on at least two major points.
07-05-2013 , 07:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frommagio
Read it again my friend. You are misunderstanding the evidence on at least two major points.
Show me...
07-05-2013 , 07:49 AM
I see your cashout came through so surely now you can see that this isn't some elaborate ruse to take your money from you.

The security checks in place found several provable connections between yourself and the account they notified you about. You seem hell bent on trying to deny these claims through loopholes rather than just putting an end to it and moving on as you could have done very quickly from the start.

The only person with the power to end this now is you, the ball is completely in your court.
07-05-2013 , 09:02 AM


Who has more credibility? Baghdad Bob or Shane?

At least Baghdad Bob has charisma. Do you wear a similar uniform and beret at work shane?
07-05-2013 , 09:19 AM
Bob has more and its not even close. Glad my friend got his money, though.
07-05-2013 , 09:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackBlood
Show me...
I've paid plenty of property taxes so that all the kids in my community can enter adulthood with critical reading skills, and I'm sure that your neighbors have as well.

Show us.
07-05-2013 , 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by joco


Who has more credibility? Baghdad Bob or Shane?
Even a broken notepad calendar must be right once a year. This could be that time.
07-06-2013 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjustshane
I see your cashout came through so surely now you can see that this isn't some elaborate ruse to take your money from you.

The security checks in place found several provable connections between yourself and the account they notified you about. You seem hell bent on trying to deny these claims through loopholes rather than just putting an end to it and moving on as you could have done very quickly from the start.

The only person with the power to end this now is you, the ball is completely in your court.
OP

I just want you to know a few things:

1- I hate shane
2- I hate lock poker

But you know what? I hate you even more because you are such a dumba$$. This could have been an epic thread for a couple reasons:

1- Someone effed over lock poker.
2- Stories and pics of hot Ho's from Thailand

You failed! You could have been Cool Hand Luke or Butch Cassiday. You could have been a hero. You could have given hope to all those who were screwed over by Lock. Instead you disappoint. You execute a chipdump with your autistic buddies and use the same computers from the same locations. How effin' stupid are you??? Its 2013!!! WTF were you thinking??? Were you thinking??? If you were unsure, you could have come to this forum for guidance and advice. But no!!! You and "The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight" have to screw it up with the most basic mistake. Hey, next time maybe you can all email shane from the same IP??? If you haven't already, you idiot.

As much as it pains me to say this, I want Shane to Locktize you. Shane you have screwed over more people that we can mention. Can you use all of your scummy powers and skills to butt hurt the OP?

Ignore him, send contradictory and vague emails, get into a pointing contest with security, point the finger at the cashier, blame the processor, send him through all the 12 cashout stages, tell him he is on the list, confuse him with batch talk, and generally lie through your teeth like you always do. In other words, do what you usually do to everyone else.

Meh!!!!
07-06-2013 , 08:34 PM
So cliffs....

Op is accused of chip dumping.

Op has money and account locked up

After evidence OP is a confirmed chip dumper.

OP IS Still allowed to cash out $10K.

This seems pretty wtf to me.
07-06-2013 , 10:52 PM
You guys are pretty ****ing crazy. You're mad that a guy got money that was very clearly rightfully his. I always tell people that poker attracts some true psychopaths and this thread is a great example of that.
07-07-2013 , 07:41 AM
If I were accuse of chip dump and the site tell me they have prove the guy I legit lost to live in the same building using same IP. I would go insane trying to find out the Assho.le friend that superuse/cheat that match. Instead Op act like it super normal and doesn't care about the lost 1.7k. I mean just email lock and tell them you mess up. After sale the rest of your Lock money for .33 as you already win the lottery ticket getting your 10k.
07-07-2013 , 07:37 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^

Don't assume that the OP will be getting his money. This is shane and this is lock poker. If they'll screw over non chip dumpers for $500, what do you think they are going to do to OP and his $10,000? 10k is a lot of money to lock. People are waiting 6 months for small cashouts, I think they'll sink before OP gets his money and that's why he is so panicky. Shane can make up a lot of stories and stall the OP for six months. He does it all the time..................
07-07-2013 , 09:56 PM
He got his 10k.
07-07-2013 , 10:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kardnel
He got his 10k.
If OP got his 10k in 2 months, then he once again becomes my hero. Well played OP, well played indeed! Now, please supply pics of Ho's from Thailand and tell us in detail the aforementioned chip dump so we can have a good laugh at shanes expense.
07-09-2013 , 10:59 AM
Bictor.... you made me smile.

OP, stay away from PatPong. Sukumvit is much better lol. Fark.. $10K in BKK is living like +$100k over here. Well, at least it was when I used to live there

      
m