Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisPCream7
Yea the beginning does kinda sound like I'm being facetious but you cant live on 3 250$ cashouts a month unless u want to argue that too.. it took u one month that's not very reliable its slowing down their system so they might aswell focus on one super reliable cashout for us players. What are you going to do with 3 250$ cashouts a month really that is 675$ a month after fees its just slowing down and it is only here to attract more us players but they need to see how focusing on having the best check service in the US will in the end attract more players. I don't see how the checks could get slower if it is the only payout they already are sending checks out really fast during maximus so there is no reason it would slow down later on unless they are stalling for the doj.
|
It sounds like you've never even done a WU cashout if you think $225 is the most you can receive after fees.
However, you're being extremely short-sighted by assuming a method that works today will work just as well days, weeks, or even months from now.
WU is a proven working cashout method. My situation was so atypical and extreme, it's not even worth discussing. Most players receive money from WU in a matter of days. Sure, WU could become a non-reliable method in the future, but we can worry about that when it happens.
If you don't like WU, don't use it. I really don't understand why you would go out of your way to have a working cashout method removed.
Either way this argument is pointless, since there's no way Lock removes WU because of your posts.
I'm done, GL at the tables
Two Plus Two
Linear Mode
