Source : http://www.pokeraffiliatesolutions.c...ng-report.html

I do not know the motivations behind the author's article. That being said, IMO the higher entries as well as the lowest ones received accurate ratings. The Merge network with checks I do not know about so I do not know if C is accurate with them.

So when 2+2 took down the banners, a time period was discussed to see if Lock would improve cashouts. They have not but also are now practicing select cashout speed to a preferred affiliate. The focus seems to be keeping the people who actually put money on the site the happiest while stringing along all the others who know better.

Maybe Lock should acquire the Pluto poker site so everyone could have one big happy Ponzi family.

"A player waiting since October for their cashout on Juicy Stakes"

So sick!!

I'm that player. Granted it's only $330 or so, but that might say even more into the situation if they're unable to clear a $330 transaction that's been outstanding since october

Wow.. The amount should be irrelevant!! You should have your money now.. Revolution network is a shamble

Question for Shame. Why can't Lock just **** procedures and just cut people a check for their cash outs? If it was my business, my first order would be to make sure the customers are happy. Without these customers the business goes under. Having someone write checks 24/7 until cash outs are caught up should be considered the cost of doing business considering the mess that has been created.

Shane posted this yesterday:

^^This while earning a D- cashout grade, downgraded from June.

Just for laughs, here's a Shane quote from September 2012:

He's like one of those dolls where you pull a string and it says the same 2 or 3 things over and over.

If the player funds were segregated and intact, that would be the obvious solution. If not, you'd expect to see something similar to what we're seeing.

We're on the outside looking in, so we can't know for sure. But it's very difficult to come up with another plausible explanation.

Sorry guys. Even IF Lock is actually entirely solvent(lol), the suggestion that Lock just start cutting checks directly to players from the bank accounts player funds are kept is ridiculous. The reasons why should be obvious and have been explained many many times.

You've taken his suggestion in a strictly literalist sense, and you've missed the big picture. Of course the checks don't need to come directly from those accounts; naturally there would be an intermediate processing step.

All he's saying is that any legitimate company would start paying all the outstanding player cashout requests as a first priority. That's a really hard point to argue against, absent misinterpretation.

Exactly! Long cash out times have gone on long enough. For Lock not to have someone working around the clock, using every means possible, sparing no expense, to get players their money is a complete insult. It has been shown that they can get cashouts in a speedy manner when they want. Why they wouldn't do that for everyone is just not right. Shane please respond.