Discussion and proposal of questions to direct to Shane - Page 10 - Two Plus Two

Two Plus Two Forums Archived Forums Internet Poker Lock Poker

Discussion and proposal of questions to direct to Shane

...

Page 10 of 10

5 6 7 8 9 10

Page 10 of 10

5 6 7 8 9 10

08-05-2013 , 01:14 AM

#226

thenextlevel1

old hand

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 1,678

Maybe we should focus on the 4-8 months it takes for a person to cash out? Or I guess people can waste are time with these stupid questions that don't matter if you can't cash out.

08-05-2013 , 01:39 PM

#227

higher visions

adept

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 827

questions got too tough for Lock, so they just up and leave. Why start this whole process of answering questions and trying to make it look like you give a ****, then just say were leaving the forum for our own forum that you can only participate in if you have money on lock and rake enough on our site.

So pathetic Lock, so pathetic.

08-05-2013 , 02:39 PM

#228

jay94

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1,476

Quote:

Originally Posted by higher visions

He answered the most important questions at least. That being said his very vague approach didn't leave many of us feeling much more informed.

08-05-2013 , 03:02 PM

#229

frommagio

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,453

Quote:

Originally Posted by jay94

He answered the most important questions at least.

I would beg to disagree. He flat out refused to address the most important issue of all: how to demonstrate to the poker community that player funds were segregated, and that the funds were actually there. Of course, the reasons for that are obvious; all signs suggest the opposite.

Any thinking person who has been around the block a few times would draw the natural conclusion.

08-05-2013 , 03:06 PM

#230

Mike Haven

Moderotor of Moderots

Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 14,546

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/19...forum-1359235/

Fwiw, imjustshane gave me no hint that this was in the offing. Before or after.

Thanks for wasting my time, Shane.

08-05-2013 , 03:11 PM

#231

jamthe3

banned

Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,269

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Haven

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/19...forum-1359235/

Fwiw, imjustshane gave me no hint that this was in the offing. Before or after.

Thanks for wasting my time, Shane.

Don't sweat it, I'm sure e1's appreciative of the extra effort you went to. Really, this is actually a positive thing imo; these people needed to leave anyways...they contribute absolutely nothing but havoc to the forum here.

btw, isn't spamming other sites/forums against the rules...give the pr**k an ifraction, lol

Last edited by jamthe3; 08-05-2013 at 03:14 PM. Reason: .

08-05-2013 , 03:16 PM

#232

frommagio

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 4,453

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Haven

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/19...forum-1359235/

Fwiw, imjustshane gave me no hint that this was in the offing. Before or after.

Thanks for wasting my time, Shane.

That's just not right. You folks gave Lock the benefit of the doubt, and provided an avenue for them to put their best foot forward.

Shane, even though you're working for a rogue site, there's no reason to be impolite to someone who tried to help you.