Going backwards does not equal not worth fixing

Again, because you're really hung up trying to invent some directional quality that laws must prove, here is the part you haven't read or understood.

Note that it doesn't say the comment has to be in the direction of the woman, towards the woman, at the woman, off the backboard and then caught mid-air by the woman, or any other non-existent directionalities you think or wish are in the law that actually aren't.

Laws do not reflect what you think ought to be there. You should dispel that belief if you insist on trying to talk about laws further.

I agree with greg nice, typically people believe that you're innocent until proven guilty and that truly is not the case anymore.
There is a lot that could be fixed in the legal world and many lives are ruined by how it is designed to favour the rich.

False accusations, such as the one in the video demonstrates; how the life of the man is affected before any justice has decided the verdict.


I have made no indication that my thoughts are what the law should be.
I'm stating that you're mistaken in the view, that she was sexually harassed in the video.

The mud wrestling is not demeaning or is the joke towards women.
Please explain how they are exactly demeaning towards women, which would result in a woman being sexually harassed if they were in the presence of the content.

Also, the black guy could have a claim of sexual harassment against the white guy for showing him porn at work.

Was it porn?

Also to add as a question to video watchers of the video such as, Low Key.

Did it appear that the actor appeared to be guilty of targeting her or other women by doing his action of saying a joke or watching a video.
It really comes down to this in my mind but may not for others or even the legal system.

Was the guy accused of sexual harassment targeting the woman or women as a gender really intentionally doing it.
Or was he simply acting on his own natural impulses as a male aged man in society; trying to spark a buddy buddy relationship with his male coworker and just living the moment with no demoniacal scheme.

Also if society has such a different view, that is more unpleasant than the man's view on his world.
He will be awfully confused about why he did something wrong; when he had no intention of committing wrong and sees no wrong in his reality.

The world may never know, since this is just a skit but i'm sure that the scene has happened in our existence, multiple times and who knows what the outcomes were.

Again this doesn't matter. It's not the intent it's the reception.

If I wanted to tell any coworker at work good job by patting them on their rear-end like I used to do on my athletic teams, that would simply not fly.

I can appreciate that we may never see eye to on this greg nice. I hope that eventually there is a balance/correction at Github that minimizes the potential for false accusers to abuse the system and actually helps those that need the help.

There is a reason I have in my post; not what the law thinks.

You have some sexual act associated to slapping someone on the rear?
If you don't then good for you.

Anyway the slapping someone in the rear are not comparable to a joke or a video.
Nobody is allowed to go around, touching people without their consent.

That is a no no and not even comparable to things that are considered free speech connected.

Watching porn at work isn't free speech.

Although I'm starting to think "free speech" is another of Yule many phrases you don't understand.

For the fifth time, completely irrelevant.

Since we're talking about an actual law that actually exists in the real world, not "how iosys wishes the world worked," what this comes down to in your head doesn't matter at all. So stop trolling ffs.

I was adding a philosophical view that is not related to my client being not guilty.
I'm not trolling when i'm saying it's seriously hard to argue that she was sexually harassed.
If I could write a way to legally prove she was sexually harassed, well I would post it.

edit:
Maybe if we had an app, that could measure their brain signals, we could sense when they were sexual harassed in their own reality of a world they've created for themselves in their mind.

Once app receives the triggered brain signals, we send the police to come and take him/her away.

Probably best if you continue ignoring all the arguments proving your own reality wrong. Troll on, broheim.

Well the app idea doesn't need both parties' realities to work in this justice system you believe we have.

We are hooking brain signals from both parties that have some bluetooth device tunnelling the signals we are getting to our phone and when one party is offended we just have other party arrested. We don't need any sort of signals from the offending person or party because they are harming someone else mentally.

A realtime visual model of such a thing would be a brain with little rapid flashes that over time turn to speckle of sparks here and there. The light being from each person affected, by other person, until we have a version of society that was from turning non sexual things such as mud wrestling (people being taken away), until no more light is shown and the brain fades into darkness...

Just fun to think about.

https://www.reddit.com/r/news/commen...ape_claim_can/

girl has sex with guy, enjoys it. tells her friends. adds guy on fb. has sex again. then sees him kissing another girl. then claims that she was originally raped. the college, clouded by the feminist nonsense that this thread exposes, kicks the guy out of school for 'gray rape'. judge has some sense and allows the guy to sue the college. but what of the girl? this behavior should be criminal

lol. Is this really going to turn into the "Coldest Day Ever - LOL GLOBAL WARMING!!!!" thread?

Edit: Fixed!

The power they hold by just word of mouth is really something.
Any super villain would seem to choose the female gender for the hidden advantages that people seem to not believe exist.

Anyway GitHub Desktop full release was today, I believe from looking at HN and linux crowd feels shafted once again.
I bet they blame the keyboard warriors in their mist for worshipping the terminal.
Good way to keep their numbers small if it continues to be the case.

Hey, there's already a politics unchained thread where a bunch of clueless guys talk about how much they hate women

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/21...e-men-1340438/

So maybe you guys can contain that nonsense over there. Lock this abortion up ffs

You can't come up with an argument to prove the woman in the video, was sexually harassed and now want to close the thread.

Nobody hates women in this thread, I believe you are typing from a bias view and maybe that is why you stopped attempting to prove your case.

Anyway it is lawl worthy to make the case that people should move to the political section of the forum, when the thread is very much about github and having any conversation besides github; requires a lock thread.

Not like the first page of "Programming" is competing for thread real-estate on this forum anyway.

you're one of the most frequent posters in that thread?

It's possible.

bolded added for clarification



You're being too obvious with this misogyny trolling

You think I'm attacking a gender by asking that question. Lol

I don't know how to imbed a you tube video. But this is the best: Offended by Steve Hughes

https://youtu.be/ceS_jkKjIgo

Related article on the right to take offense and coddling the American mind:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/...n-mind/399356/

its very related. that article describes the problem exactly

and relevant to this thread, we can add the statement "the meritocracy of github"

check your privilige