Quote:
Originally Posted by just_grindin
Not really. If something can be construed as sexual in nature and someone doesn't approve, it can be enforced as sexual harassment. It won't always happen that way, say if there was a lude joke and HR just said it violated their code of conduct or something, but it doesn't have to be that way. That was sort of my whole point earlier in the thread - there are still human enforcement decisions even when there are written rules.
It's not like I have to grope someone or ask for sexual favors for it to qualify as sexual harassment.
A company doesn't just tailor their own version of the law.
You seem to have a tough time letting go of the fact, the creator of the script for that video, failed at their main task in demonstrating sexual harassment.
The man's original plan in the video was to show the mud wrestling, to his black male friend. The female coworker walked in unannounced to the man's cubicle, completely showing disrespect for the man's space or privacy and ultimately taking the dominate role in the scene.
She sees the video clip, sadly we cannot see and we must acquire the possibilities that the women were clothed or not clothed. Yes, it was linked from a porn site but we all know; there are men getting aroused by just staring at feet online. Anything that could be, watched in life, could stimulate a certain crowd of people sexually.
So why is my client, guilty of committing a sexual harassment act to the female.
If the roles were reversed and it had been a female playing male mud wrestling and a male coworker had walked in, would there have been this sexual harassment filed? I'm guessing not but mainly because the males realize the world shouldn't revolve around them and would not see any harassment at him.
The female snapped, has shown disrespect to my client and is now harassing my client with false claims.
She should be required to see therapy and have a better life.
Last edited by iosys; 08-05-2015 at 09:21 AM.