|
|
| High Stakes PL/NL Discussions about high stakes pot-limit and no-limit hold'em (10-20 and up) |
|
View Poll Results: How should we fix table blocking in 6max?
|
|
No change
|
  
|
58 |
24.58% |
|
Sit out one, sit out all
|
  
|
83 |
35.17% |
|
2 min, 5 min Timer Rule
|
  
|
95 |
40.25% |
02-04-2012, 05:15 PM
|
#1
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Left 4 Dead
Posts: 1,965
|
Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Problem #1: Table blocking in 6max.
Table blocking is the practice of sitting into 6max or fullring tables (primarily at high stakes) with no intention of playing until a perceived fish sits in. This insures the bumhunter gets a seat at any table in the lobby a fish sits at without having to play any hands versus another regular or work to start a table. A further part of this practice is filling a table up completely with all or all but one player sitting out in order to deny other bumhunters the opportunity to secure a seat at a table a fish might sit at. This practice also makes it difficult to start games as there may be no open seats on the table for two game-starters to play in.
The poll options here will be as follows:
(1): No change
-This means that either a) the current system is better than any proposed change, or b) it isn't a problem in the first place.
(2): 'Sit out one, sit out all'
- This means changing the client such that sitting out on one table makes the player sit out on all tables.
-I want to note a potential problem with this solution is dealing with timing out on various tables.
(3): '2 min, 5 min Timer Rule'
-Give each player a two minute timer to sit out on a non hu table where there is no action. After this the player cannot sit at the table for 5 minutes. If they sit in for < 2 min and then leave and sit in again their timer picks up where it left off from before.
Last edited by sauce123; 02-04-2012 at 05:41 PM.
Reason: Misstyped Title of thread, mods fix plz ... to 'Table Blocking in 6max'
|
|
|
02-04-2012, 05:43 PM
|
#2
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: kothpoker
Posts: 3,170
|
re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Force players to auto-post when they sit, and if you leave a table before X hands are played, you have to pay your opponent 2bb's.
|
|
|
02-04-2012, 10:00 PM
|
#3
|
|
banned
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 289
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Scansion.... stop pulling these arbitrary numbers out of thin air. Nothing about the pay your opponent rule makes sense and it will only confuse players about the software.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 01:54 AM
|
#4
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: POSTING IN ****TY THREAD
Posts: 10,865
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
it's already kind of fixed.
http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/room/policies/ring/
Quote:
|
10.In general players are expected to be seated with the purpose of playing
|
Quote:
11.At tables with more than two seats:
It is acceptable to be seated but occasionally deny action in certain circumstances, such as being seated to help start a new ring game but not wanting to play heads-up.
It is not acceptable to remain sitting out at a table (especially an active one) waiting for one of only a few preferred opponents to arrive or sit in.
In general, seated players are expected to accept action much more often than they refuse it.
|
The rules just lack enforcement. lots of HSLHE people are actively reporting people who are snap-sitting out when fish sit out and remain at the table since it's apparently against stars rules. the rule just, as i mentioned, lacks enforcement and therefore is useless ( and makes people who try to follow the rules lose money since they get button'd constantly.)
further reading: HSLHE thread discussing it http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...l#post30374308
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 05:46 AM
|
#5
|
|
old hand
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,539
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Quote:
Originally Posted by skillgambler
it's already kind of fixed.
http://www.pokerstars.com/poker/room/policies/ring/
The rules just lack enforcement. lots of HSLHE people are actively reporting people who are snap-sitting out when fish sit out and remain at the table since it's apparently against stars rules. the rule just, as i mentioned, lacks enforcement and therefore is useless ( and makes people who try to follow the rules lose money since they get button'd constantly.)
further reading: HSLHE thread discussing it http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...l#post30374308
|
true its fixed imo. look at other sites like ipoker or party. there is a lot blocking going on and stars nearly eliminated it throgh their rules.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 10:24 AM
|
#6
|
|
2006/2007 HSNL HU champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: @PeterJetten
Posts: 6,046
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
I think it should be more like 2 min, 20 min people should just be sitting down at tables they want to play at.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 02:52 PM
|
#7
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,707
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
A player should only be allowed to sit out when no action is present for a given time period (the average time it takes 3 orbits for the given game), the player should then be removed from that table for a reasonable amount of time like listed above, but I do think using the avg time 3 orbits takes at that game would be a good number to go off.
Also, what if Pokerstars had a "Poker Room Manager" who's job would be to oversee the higher stake games running and would have the ability to pull these people sitting out off the table if it is clogging the games up. Pokerstars proved they have the ability to do this during the attemped protest a month back.
I do think on the subject of excessively long waitlist a player should have a cap of some sort as to how many waitlist they can join, perhaps it could be like a sliding scale between 0 and 36 for total tables a player is sat at and total waitlist he can join; so if a player is on 0 tables he can join 36 waitlist, if player is on 12 tables he can join 24 waitlist, and if he is on 24 tables he can join up to 12 waitlist. This would cause the waitlist to be well shorter while still allowing the mass tablers to get on 24 tables quickly.
Last edited by NatisFinest; 02-05-2012 at 02:57 PM.
|
|
|
02-05-2012, 11:51 PM
|
#8
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 498
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Quote:
Originally Posted by NatisFinest
A player should only be allowed to sit out when no action is present for a given time period (the average time it takes 3 orbits for the given game), the player should then be removed from that table for a reasonable amount of time like listed above, but I do think using the avg time 3 orbits takes at that game would be a good number to go off.
Also, what if Pokerstars had a "Poker Room Manager" who's job would be to oversee the higher stake games running and would have the ability to pull these people sitting out off the table if it is clogging the games up. Pokerstars proved they have the ability to do this during the attemped protest a month back.
I do think on the subject of excessively long waitlist a player should have a cap of some sort as to how many waitlist they can join, perhaps it could be like a sliding scale between 0 and 36 for total tables a player is sat at and total waitlist he can join; so if a player is on 0 tables he can join 36 waitlist, if player is on 12 tables he can join 24 waitlist, and if he is on 24 tables he can join up to 12 waitlist. This would cause the waitlist to be well shorter while still allowing the mass tablers to get on 24 tables quickly.
|
+1
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 08:23 AM
|
#9
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 457
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
sit out one sit out all seems like a very obvious solution to this issue
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 04:17 PM
|
#10
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Serbia
Posts: 3,837
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Can someone explain to me, how in the world can a fish sit onto a table if every seat is occupied by a bumhunter that is sitting out?
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 05:48 PM
|
#11
|
|
stranger
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Quote:
Originally Posted by NatisFinest
I do think on the subject of excessively long waitlist a player should have a cap of some sort as to how many waitlist they can join, perhaps it could be like a sliding scale between 0 and 36 for total tables a player is sat at and total waitlist he can join; so if a player is on 0 tables he can join 36 waitlist, if player is on 12 tables he can join 24 waitlist, and if he is on 24 tables he can join up to 12 waitlist. This would cause the waitlist to be well shorter while still allowing the mass tablers to get on 24 tables quickly.
|
+1
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 06:54 PM
|
#12
|
|
veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Location: A farm
Posts: 2,150
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Sit out one sit out all is dumb and will never be implemented. There are perfectly reasonable situations in which someone wants to sit out at one of their tables.
The only issue is when hands aren't being played at the table at all (otherwise ppl get booted after an orbit or 2 anyway right?)
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 07:45 PM
|
#13
|
|
veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,110
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowpig
Sit out one sit out all is dumb and will never be implemented. There are perfectly reasonable situations in which someone wants to sit out at one of their tables.
The only issue is when hands aren't being played at the table at all (otherwise ppl get booted after an orbit or 2 anyway right?)
|
Care to share what those situations may be? I understand if you are on a ton of tables or something but If you have a couple minute buffer time to get yourself sorted it shouldn't be an issue. I've been playing online poker for 6 years now and I can't remember a single time where I absolutely needed to sit out at one table while playing others. I could be wrong, though.
|
|
|
02-07-2012, 07:48 PM
|
#14
|
|
grinder
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 457
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowpig
Sit out one sit out all is dumb and will never be implemented. There are perfectly reasonable situations in which someone wants to sit out at one of their tables.
The only issue is when hands aren't being played at the table at all (otherwise ppl get booted after an orbit or 2 anyway right?)
|
for instance?
|
|
|
02-08-2012, 11:47 AM
|
#15
|
|
adept
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 940
|
Re: Vote: Table Blocking in 6-max on Pokerstars
For "sit out one = sit out all," wouldn't a "sit out next BB all tables" button solve most potential problems?
I too would like to hear what situations cowpig (and others) have in mind.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.
|