|
|
| High Stakes PL/NL Discussions about high stakes pot-limit and no-limit hold'em (10-20 and up) |
05-13-2010, 05:45 PM
|
#241
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: blog!!! + brighton
Posts: 7,322
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
i think krantz was bluffing. can't remember if GP folded or called, i seem to think he folded
|
|
|
|
05-13-2010, 06:24 PM
|
#242
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Professional Flamer
Posts: 1,912
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRANTZ
<3 how this has devolved into HU grudge match thread.
tay folded and I had 9c9x.
carry on
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by walrus_poker
results?
|
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlocdog
I hate to hijack the thread but it really pisses me off when people come into a thread regardless if it was a good one or not, but way more so when it was a good/great one and asks for something as stupid as the results when you have many of the greatest thinkers/players on this site offering their time to contribute to the forum. ESPECIALLY WHEN THE ****ING RESULTS HAVE BEEN POSTED!! The fact that you don't know that means that a)you didn't take the time to read the thread, b)you read the thread but didn't actually care about the content, c) you are a retard.
I really hope it is choice C for many of you, because it would be a damn shame to waste such a great resource such as these great players minds/contributions. Don't take them for granted and don't abuse these boards. If you are interested in something, take some time to try and find your answer. It is usually there. And if the results haven't been posted....there is a good reason for that. It usually means there is more discussion to be had. Do not stifle this.
Happy Holidays all
Resume original thread....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mirrychristmas
btw anyone know results?
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-13-2010, 07:59 PM
|
#243
|
|
centurion
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 186
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
results?
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2010, 05:54 AM
|
#244
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,709
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
i think someone posted that jay had the straight flush and tay called with top set
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2010, 06:10 AM
|
#245
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: ^_^
Posts: 13,349
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
Grunch. Nh
Results?
|
|
|
|
|
05-14-2010, 05:04 PM
|
#246
|
|
stranger
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
puke first then call right?! jay is sick enuff to bluff on this spot - puts him up there with durrrr
tape the next 2m2m s02 already kranz 
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2010, 02:52 AM
|
#247
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Unearned income my a**!
Posts: 4,557
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
Quote:
Originally Posted by durrrr
alaei v bld would be v interesting 500bb deep...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALAEI
Sounds like would be fun. I'll try it with him at 50/100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2010, 04:06 PM
|
#248
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: upper level
Posts: 261
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
As played I think its a fold. Overall though I think I would pot control and bluff catch riv
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2010, 06:28 AM
|
#249
|
|
journeyman
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: AIOTF
Posts: 255
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
I think the turn card is a great card to raise with QxJc. Don't think he is bluffing here, don't think this is KK, I don't think he would check the turn with AA (maybe, why would he check raise AA here instead of leading out though). It's either AA, JxQc or a weird flopped flush (KcJc? Kc9c?).
River is a fold I feel.
edit: after seeing results, lol sick hand. But still as I said, a great turn card to raise (even though I didn't think he had that hand, kinda close though).
Raise the flop with a set here next time.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2010, 09:55 AM
|
#250
|
|
Carpal \'Tunnel
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: TY IDIOT
Posts: 7,726
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlocdog
I hate to hijack the thread but it really pisses me off when people come into a thread regardless if it was a good one or not, but way more so when it was a good/great one and asks for something as stupid as the results when you have many of the greatest thinkers/players on this site offering their time to contribute to the forum. ESPECIALLY WHEN THE ****ING RESULTS HAVE BEEN POSTED!! The fact that you don't know that means that a)you didn't take the time to read the thread, b)you read the thread but didn't actually care about the content, c) you are a retard.
I really hope it is choice C for many of you, because it would be a damn shame to waste such a great resource such as these great players minds/contributions. Don't take them for granted and don't abuse these boards. If you are interested in something, take some time to try and find your answer. It is usually there. And if the results haven't been posted....there is a good reason for that. It usually means there is more discussion to be had. Do not stifle this.
Happy Holidays all
Resume original thread....
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by solow
results?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boobies4me
i think someone posted that jay had the straight flush and tay called with top set
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToTheInternet
Grunch. Nh
Results?
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2010, 06:07 PM
|
#251
|
|
old hand
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,804
|
Re: TT, HU, very deep vs Krantz
Quote:
Originally Posted by boobies4me
i think someone posted that jay had the straight flush and tay called with top set
|
is this a level ?
i was in awe reading through the thinking/reasoning of some of the players posting in the thread
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.
|
Two Plus Two
