Stoxtrader cheating/multi accounting discussion - Page 5 - High Stakes Poker Pot Limit and No Limit

rbracco · 03-14-2010, 09:43 PM

lol @ serious and personal reasons. So shady.

nycballer · 03-14-2010, 09:50 PM

now that stoxtrader has admitted to multi-accounting can we put his name back in the title please, guy should be immediately demodded and **** the idiot mods who tried to hide this. had people not been persistent this wouldve never come to light

Redgrape · 03-14-2010, 09:55 PM

If the reason you multi accounted isn't "underhanded" why not just tell us?

bronx bomber · 03-14-2010, 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nycballer

now that stoxtrader has admitted to multi-accounting can we put his name back in the title please, guy should be immediately demodded and **** the idiot mods who tried to hide this. had people not been persistent this wouldve never come to light

Fat chance IMO:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/10...-moved-695466/

Micturition Man · 03-14-2010, 10:10 PM

Was always surprised anyone would pay for coaching from stox in anything other than self-promotion and bumhunting.

Also nice to see he hasn't lost his penchant for posting database screenshots. Hard to argue with someone who makes $1 per hand!!!11

/hater

kikadell · 03-14-2010, 10:51 PM

maybe this has something to do with the mystery reason leatherass left? either he knew it was going on and didnt want to out or he was involved and wanted to get out before it blew up?

bones · 03-14-2010, 11:05 PM

I hope you guys aren't implying that leatherass would leave a profitable venture because he faced some ethical dilemma.

La Peste · 03-14-2010, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bones

I hope you guys aren't implying that leatherass would leave a profitable venture because he faced some ethical dilemma.

lol

hammer_time · 03-14-2010, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bones

I hope you guys aren't implying that leatherass would leave a profitable venture because he faced some ethical dilemma.

i lol'd out loud at this one

Mackenzieee · 03-15-2010, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bones

I hope you guys aren't implying that leatherass would leave a profitable venture because he faced some ethical dilemma.

lol wp

gordo16 · 03-15-2010, 12:16 AM

what a joke

Topset72 · 03-15-2010, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by viffer

Beyond that I cannot and will not comment on the screename issue, nor can I say why I cannot elaborate further other than to say that my reasons for that are serious and personal.

Russ hamilton took it personally when people accused him of cheating and wished he hadnt gotten caught,

i just want to thank the mods that decided that all the acusations were false and for trying to cover this up!!!!

can anyone cross check the numbers of hands played to known accounts of his to see if he just admitted to multi accounting? i mean if his account only played a few hands but claims to have so many hands, ummmmmmmmm!!!!!

f

mOOgly · 03-15-2010, 12:22 AM

LOL wow
i have played so much with 2 of your accounts, and im sure to be soon 3 of your accounts.. I wonder how much ev you cheated me out of because you knew who i was but i didnt know i was playing 40putts who i had extensive history with?

but hey, at least you posted a cool graph and gave reasons for cheating!
the ironic part is i dont even know why you switch your screen name when your so awful, i am sure me and many others would line up to give you action on whatever screen name that you use which has the most cash.. Just try to post blinds instead of sitting out for once

kikadell · 03-15-2010, 12:26 AM

just a standard question, was he meant to be playing under his stoxtrader sn's, or was there another he was known to use?

**ike** · 03-15-2010, 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stoxtrader

There are online poker players who have used 2nd screenames for the purpose of deceiving others into giving them action, evading taxes, collusion, entering multiple times into the same tournament, ghosting, to obscure previous results and stats, to clear extra bonuses, to circumvent affiliate CPA or rakeback rules, to bypass the pokersites shortstack buy-in time limitation, to teamplay, to share action with others at the same table, to chip dump or otherwise engage in underhanded actions I do not know about. I have never done any of these things. Beyond that I cannot and will not comment on the screename issue, nor can I say why I cannot elaborate further other than to say that my reasons for that are serious and personal.

I have played a shortstack some of the time, I will do this when games are tough and I don't want to just not play, when there is a good game at a "shallow" table, in CAP NL games, or I think it's the most profitable strategy for that particular table. My poker results are shown over my last 650k hands or so in the HEM screenshot below, and they are sorted by stack size. A good percentage of the "under 50bbs" stack size games are from cap tables, where the buy-in is 30bbs. The rest are from 20-40 BB buy-in at "shallow" tables and a 20-50BB buyin at normal tables. The collusion allegation is laughable and completely false.

Did you open extra SNGs?