Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Is This A Close Decision? Is This A Close Decision?

02-13-2014 , 02:54 PM
With a $1500 stack that is covered by everybody in a live 5-10 blind game with mediocre opponents, you pick up two kings on the button. Four limps to you. You are somehow sure that making it $60 will get exactly one call while making it $30 will get exactly five calls. Which play would tend, without further information, to have the higher long run EV?
02-13-2014 , 03:08 PM
one call is better against average players but if there are against horrible players you might want the 6 way flop but you are going to have to lay it down sometimes
02-13-2014 , 03:23 PM
I'd take it heads up to the flop . Too many callers = too many hand ranges and combinations. Making it heads up makes ur chances of winning better, so why not ?
02-13-2014 , 03:33 PM
ignoring postflop play

6way, 40% equity in 185 pot, minus 30 invested, EV 44
2way, 78% equity in a 165 pot, minus 60 invested, EV 69

I don't have a good postflop approximation for 6way. But don't think it can be that much better than HU, so answer should be clearly the HU spot.
02-13-2014 , 04:00 PM
You'll be able to earn much more money on future streets in the hu pot. I wouldn't be surprised if getting 1 call is better than 5 even if you make it 60 in both cases.
02-13-2014 , 05:23 PM
against tough online opponents (that somehow limped around :P) I'd rather have 1 opponent. against mediocre 5/10nl live players i'd rather have 5 calls.

I don't think converting equity into ev works here because the mediocre live players will make far worse mistakes and not always realize their equity yet we will very often realize ours (with position and presumably better hand reading skills) and be much less likely to make big mistakes.
02-13-2014 , 07:55 PM
Suppose you knew the flop would be Qd 5h 2h.
02-13-2014 , 10:24 PM
and the forth caller touches hit nose briefly and looks off to the left before checking
02-13-2014 , 11:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Suppose you knew the flop would be Qd 5h 2h.
David is this hypothetical? Did you get stacked by 2-5 offsuit on this board?
02-14-2014 , 03:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiltOnTilt
against tough online opponents (that somehow limped around :P) I'd rather have 1 opponent. against mediocre 5/10nl live players i'd rather have 5 calls.

I don't think converting equity into ev works here because the mediocre live players will make far worse mistakes and not always realize their equity yet we will very often realize ours (with position and presumably better hand reading skills) and be much less likely to make big mistakes.
I was invited to play in a private online "home" game with mediocre players...what should i do?

(I was thinking against mediocre players i would want 5 calls and against a tough lineup i would want heads up but the live online thing is obviously germane so i need help!)
02-14-2014 , 03:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
With a $1500 stack that is covered by everybody in a live 5-10 blind game with mediocre opponents, you pick up two kings on the button. Four limps to you. You are somehow sure that making it $60 will get exactly one call while making it $30 will get exactly five calls. Which play would tend, without further information, to have the higher long run EV?
wait, what year is this? 2002 1 caller. now 5 callers.
02-14-2014 , 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EmpireMaker2
David is this hypothetical? Did you get stacked by 2-5 offsuit on this board?
No. Someone just asked me my opinion.
02-14-2014 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lnternet
ignoring postflop play

6way, 40% equity in 185 pot, minus 30 invested, EV 44
2way, 78% equity in a 165 pot, minus 60 invested, EV 69

I don't have a good postflop approximation for 6way. But don't think it can be that much better than HU, so answer should be clearly the HU spot.
this is assuming we just run the board out. including postflop play would narrow the gap between 40 percent and 78 percent equity (since we cbet out backdoors, maybe gutters, weak pairs OTF).

so to answer david's question, yes, but in a vacuum still probably go with HU pot.
02-14-2014 , 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by limon
I was invited to play in a private online "home" game with mediocre players...what should i do?

(I was thinking against mediocre players i would want 5 calls and against a tough lineup i would want heads up but the live online thing is obviously germane so i need help!)
the comment wasn't meant to be a slight against live players, simply that the tendencies of someone described as a mediocre live player are different than the tendencies of a mediocre online player...(similar for tough live vs tough online) especially for how it relates to their postflop thought processes. The generic labels just say more for how the default person with that label will tend to play their range and how self aware they are about that range.
02-16-2014 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Suppose you knew the flop would be Qd 5h 2h.
if this was the flop then id want the 6 players in. They all are likely to share eachothers outs.. and since they arent great players you could exploit their weaknesses on this board.
02-16-2014 , 01:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiltOnTilt
the comment wasn't meant to be a slight against live players, simply that the tendencies of someone described as a mediocre live player are different than the tendencies of a mediocre online player...(similar for tough live vs tough online) especially for how it relates to their postflop thought processes. The generic labels just say more for how the default person with that label will tend to play their range and how self aware they are about that range.
just f'n with u a little. sometimes i feel the online live shorthand is a bit lazy.
02-16-2014 , 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lnternet
ignoring postflop play

6way, 40% equity in 185 pot, minus 30 invested, EV 44
2way, 78% equity in a 165 pot, minus 60 invested, EV 69

I don't have a good postflop approximation for 6way. But don't think it can be that much better than HU, so answer should be clearly the HU spot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Suppose you knew the flop would be Qd 5h 2h.
on Q52f I get our equity
6way 42%
2way 81%

So both increase a bit, but stays extremely similar. 80% HU def plays better than 40% multiway, so here the case is clear that we prefer 2way.
02-17-2014 , 02:44 PM
125
02-18-2014 , 12:45 AM
One caller in situation 1.

Knowledge of Q52, it's closer than people think (mediocre people play hands that will make 2p /sets and own you for the remaining 97bbs or spaz with big draws making u fold incorrectly) but I'd take on the 5 players.
02-18-2014 , 05:14 AM
HU and not close for me.

Main reason is that I think sometimes we fold incorrectly in 6 way pot, if pot gets huge we lose a lot of the time if we call. People don't get as out of line in 6 way pots so I think we put ourselves in a really tough spot when it checks to us and we bet then get action...

HU raised is super easy because people spazz in raised pots way more often IMO, and a lot of the time our c bet wins an easy pot. We also get some big pots when our V flops worse and gets sticky, and we rarely get stacked.

Heads up = easier spots and higher EV long term.
02-18-2014 , 01:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
Suppose you knew the flop would be Qd 5h 2h.
HU fo sho, too much reverse equity multiway. This flop maintains the preflop equities nearly identical as preflop, but KK simply gives up too much equity the more players enter the pot for too small of a price relatively to the HU situation.

This hypothetical is not even close. the HU situation is so much more profitable.
02-18-2014 , 06:28 PM
What are the odds that David Sklansky can beat 100NL online?
02-18-2014 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Sklansky
With a $1500 stack that is covered by everybody in a live 5-10 blind game with mediocre opponents, you pick up two kings on the button. Four limps to you. You are somehow sure that making it $60 will get exactly one call while making it $30 will get exactly five calls. Which play would tend, without further information, to have the higher long run EV?
I'm going to simplify this problem and compare the EV it will be auto-checked down post flop. I'm going to use the %s someone used earlier.

"6way, 40% equity"
2way, 78% equity"

EV $60 = .78*$95 - .22*$60 = +$60.9

EV $30 = .4*$150 - .6*$30 = $60 - $18 = +$42

I chose $60 and 1 caller.
02-21-2014 , 01:37 AM
The more I think about this spot. The more I think that its not a close decision, but an intractable one. Even simplifying the preflop action, we need to simulate the actions and ranges of 5 players postflop with a multitude of different board textures and compare it to the actions of ranges of one player.

Also the equity approach is crummy. Kings wins more than 1 bb when minraised on the button preflop (.75*4bb - 2 = 1). My holdem manager database has Kings winning 3 big blinds in this spot. Postflop play and playability is worth $$$.
02-21-2014 , 03:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BertMcgert
What are the odds that David Sklansky can beat 100NL online?
0 if the samples big enough

      
m