Quote:
Originally Posted by viffer
Zeejustin has been known to argue for his own bennifit, Didnt he spend countless post sticking up for the Epic poker league? Hes biassed
I never stuck up for the league as a whole. I said:
A) I'm under the impression the pedophile willingly took the $1,500 compensation. If this is the case, the casino is not breaking any laws.
B) The rules made it clear that he was not eligible to participate. They're going for an NFL type thing (I never commented on whether this was good or bad).
C) Casinos are greedy and you can't expect them to give out 20k to someone violating their rules. It's bad business. Is it the most moral way to do things? Of course not. It's a ****ing casino.
How the **** was anything I said here self serving or bias? I wasn't affiliated with the league in any way other than playing their tournaments. I never said they handled the situation well, and I never said that legally ok means ethically ok.
Furthermore, I'm not bias in the ongoing discussion at all. The person I have money against understands the bet is still 100% on. We have communicated over the years, and there's no ambiguity here. My situation is wrapped up nicely, and there are no complaints on either side. What I say here has no bearing on that. The only horse I have in this race is not wanting to see my friends get stolen from by you and Danny. Your chance to buy out was over 2 years ago. You didn't buy out so ****ing deal with it and pay your debts like a real gambler.