Yeah, my bad.. I wont respond to him anymore

so... this means nl10k normal tables are never coming back?

Yea jesus christ nick can you tell us what's going to happen? I mean there hasn't been a 10knl game running in ages? Are you guys going to bring it back or not?

I haven't seen it run for months and many of the regulars have openly requested the reinstatement of regular 10k. Starts to feel like one of those small casinos where they just don't let 9 agreeing players choose a game...

It would also be very useful if Stars could show the true amount of entries at zoom >5/10 instead of the amount of players. It would be consistent with lower limits and make the decision easier as to how many of each game to enter. The image of zoom would also benefit from an increase in the number of players at the highest stakes.

More offtopic as it mainly affects MSNL but it is perhaps time for the site to consider allowing 6 tabling a certain zoom stake. Achieving SNE on 4 entries takes an amount of time not everyone can afford to spend and is virtually impossible below 200NL. This leads to many regs playing 6 to 8 entries with significantly different amounts of money and another player pool, in my opinion to their disadvantage.

Might be a few things you can think about if you so persistently want to promote zoom before hammering away your most prestigious regular tables

Not really..

So, communication has completely stopped and no improvements have been made?

http://www.pokernews.com/video/danie...ually-9133.htm

Daniel Negreanu speaks out about seating scripts

Well, it took less than two years for Stars to understand that ZOOM at 50/100 NLHE is a terrible idea. The 40-100bb and deep ante tables are back, to be honest, I have no idea for how long (my guess is not for so long).

One thing that bothers me is that $50/$100 CAP is still ZOOM-only at these stakes. Kind of sucks, considering there was some action that could easily migrate to 50/100 CAP 6-max tables.