Quote:
Originally Posted by feruell
Appendix with the hands
$500/$1000 No Limit Holdem
3 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
BTN benkaremail ($5,000)
SB dooshcom ($9,997)
BB feruell ($18,985)
Pre-Flop: ($1,500, 3 players) feruell is BB K J
benkaremail raises to $2,000, dooshcom goes all-in $9,997, feruell goes all-in $18,985, benkaremail calls $3,000
Flop: A K 2 ($33,982, 3 players, 2 all-in)
Turn: Q ($33,982, 3 players, 2 all-in)
River: Q ($33,982, 3 players, 2 all-in)
Final Pot: $33,982
dooshcom shows
7 5
feruell shows
K J
benkaremail shows
6 8
feruell wins $33,979 (net +$14,994)
dooshcom lost $9,997
benkaremail lost $5,000
Impossible open raise by benkaremail and reraise by dooshcom.Double misclick is very unlikely. If they know each other cards both plays make sense.
$500/$1000 No Limit Holdem
3 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
BTN benkaremail ($17,991)
SB feruell ($8,997)
BB dooshcom ($5,000)
Pre-Flop: ($1,500, 3 players) feruell is SB A A
benkaremail goes all-in $17,991, feruell calls $8,497, dooshcom calls $4,000
Flop: Q 7 2 ($31,988, 3 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: 3 ($31,988, 3 players, 1 all-in)
River: 8 ($31,988, 3 players, 1 all-in)
Final Pot: $31,988
benkaremail shows
7 9
feruell shows
A A
dooshcom shows
8 10
feruell wins $22,991 (net +$13,994)
benkaremail collects $8,994 (net -$8,997)
dooshcom lost $5,000
Bad open push by benkaremail (unless he has a partner on BB) and bad overcall by dooshom (unless he knows that button has only 97o).
$500/$1000 No Limit Holdem
4 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
CO needAAAA ($21,985)
BTN DooshCom ($14,991)
SB feruell ($22,982)
BB liverfc123 ($5,000)
Pre-Flop: ($1,500, 4 players) feruell is SB 7 A
1 fold, DooshCom raises to $2,000, feruell goes all-in $22,982, liverfc123 goes all-in $4,000, DooshCom folds
Flop: 6 2 8 ($12,000, 2 players, 2 all-in)
Turn: 5 ($12,000, 2 players, 2 all-in)
River: A ($12,000, 2 players, 2 all-in)
Final Pot: $12,000
feruell shows
7 A
liverfc123 shows
10 4
feruell wins $29,979 (net +$6,997)
DooshCom lost $2,000
liverfc123 lost $5,000
A call with T4o??? Makes sense only if you know that your partner has nothing and is going to fold. So you have 3.5k of dead money in the pot and that makes the odds to call much better.
I don't get it. Are they colluding to light as much money on fire as fast as possible? Even if they're sharing hole cards all of these plays just seem awful.
I'm not saying there isn't something sketchy going on here. Everything else you describe seems pretty weird. But they're just playing terribly in the hands you posted.
For instance, the T4o call:
He's getting 2 : 1 if he knows the other guy is folding.
Hand | Pot equity | Wins | Ties |
---|
t4o | 29.58% | 1,804,410,096 | 99,065,148 |
25% | 70.42% | 4,363,557,396 | 99,065,148 |
Hand | Pot equity | Wins | Ties |
---|
t4o | 31.64% | 2,725,607,784 | 140,251,488 |
35% | 68.36% | 5,969,629,368 | 140,251,488 |
Hand | Pot equity | Wins | Ties |
---|
t4o | 33.11% | 3,587,147,916 | 214,970,904 |
44% | 66.89% | 7,355,254,044 | 214,970,904 |
Hand | Pot equity | Wins | Ties |
---|
t4o | 33.15% | 193,125 | 11,556 |
38% | 66.85% | 395,319 | 11,556 |
He'd need to think you were shoving 44% over doosh's open for the T4o call to be good. It can get down to 38% if we assume doosh is folding a2o, which is about the best blockers he could have and remotely consider folding, but of course if their team has you on shoving 38%, he'll just call you with A2o instead of letting his teammate with T4o try to chase you down.
Last edited by ike; 09-13-2011 at 07:38 AM.