Quote:
Originally Posted by urien|xs
Anytime there is a multi-way showdown, the 2nd person to call the river bet usually has a solid hand if not the winning hand (obviously no bluffs) due to the fact that they know there's a 3rd person still in the hand. The only hand that a pair of 3's beats is Ace high and bluffs, and I mentioned the 2nd villian will have no bluffs in his range at showdown in a multiway river.
River is a easy muck for sure.
Standard ABC poker play
1. raise pre
2. standard cbet in position
3. turn check is fine due to board texture
4. V1 bets, V2 calls, you muck
first he is not saying what hand he could beat, he is saying if he can represent the nuts flush.
Second, why you are going to cbet that flop? you are going to win the pot ? what are u representing ?. sb and bb for sure can have a double par, a straight draw a flush draw.
i think the way to play the hand is:
1. raise pre
2. check
3. check
4. fold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timhvids
I don't understand, majority are saying that we should check flop. Disclaimer: I don't play anywhere near these stakes, so I'm really curious as to why a cbet is out of the question here? We have position, and an overpair is well within the range of hands we would have, so I don't see why we aren't cbetting. If we had JJ-AA we would, but because we decided to play 33 we aren't? If we are never checking this flop with over pairs, why are we checking and giving up the pot here, basically turning our hand face up?
Or is the big 'cbetting' issue the players we are playing against?
well is a little bit different to play AA to play 33, with 33 any 9 and any 10 are calling you and you have a really weak showdown.
If you have AA KK QQ JJ definetly you are betting extracting value from 9s 10s draws, so your comparision is not good at all.
op: You can represent a big flush, the point is %80 of the time you will be call
Last edited by duckyfAL; 01-24-2017 at 09:51 AM.