I posted a few days ago, about a series of game I had against some guy because I wanted some comments on my game (here http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...eeded-1213777/.)
One of the comments was that I started to over-adjust a little to the early stats of villain.
And I have a question for a spot I encountered today, where I think I might have overadjusted a bit.

So we were only 20 hands in the game, and villain had 50% 3bet frequency. So I was thinking that he must be a wide 3bettor.

Come this hand, 40BB deep. I raised preflop with A8s, and he 3bet me one more time, and I decided to 4bet shove on top of his 3bet.
And this is where I think I might have overadjusted a bit quickly.
Do you think I should just have called ? Or is there a chance that my play is not totally bad ?

4bet shoving suited Ax against someone who would 4bet as wide as 50% would be totally fine I think (with accurate stats).
But do you think that I should have waited a little more hands before making such adjustment ?

i think it is well played given the info you have.

And if you are interested here is a free article from husng (that i must admit i haven't read as a whole myself) about interpreting small samplesizes.

http://www.husng.com/content/interpr...ian-estimators

I think you play fine.

50% is prob too high to be his real 3b % but even if he's 3betting 30% it's a no brainer jam. you played it fine, don't worry

Thanks for the answers guys.

@stone75: thanks for the link. very interesting article

4b shipping any sooooted ace A7o+ any pair should be +EV vs this guy. I would prolly flat most boardways 78s 97s etc and 4b ship weaker aces, 4b/c 99+AQ+ to induce spazz. U can also build a 4b/f range if he doesn't call small 4bets. Like make it 10bbs (he 3betz to 5bbs) w K2s 40bbs deep.