Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Tournament Poker > Heads Up SNG

Notices

Heads Up SNG Discussion of heads up Sit & Go poker games. Sponsored by HUSNG.com, the leading heads up poker video site.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2012, 01:55 PM   #1
journeyman
 
shiftizzle2k9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 359
Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    IPoker, $30 Buy-in (30/60 blinds) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 2 Players
    Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #13397932

    Hero (BB): 1,390 (23.2 bb)
    SB: 1,610 (26.8 bb)

    Preflop: Hero is BB with J T
    SB raises to 120, Hero calls 60

    Flop: (240) A Q 9 (2 players)
    Hero checks, SB bets 120, Hero raises to 360, SB raises to 1,490 and is all-in, Hero calls 910 and is all-in

    Turn: (2,780) A (2 players, 2 are all-in)
    River: (2,780) 2 (2 players, 2 are all-in)




    Get the Flash Player to use the Hold'em Manager Replayer.


    I think when he ships it in a call is standard? but I'm wondering whether a call or c/r on the flop is superior.

    I'm also interested on what we do on the following turns Ac, Jc, 2d, 2h, Kh?

    Thank you in advance
    shiftizzle2k9 is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-02-2012, 03:18 PM   #2
    adept
     
    Almito's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jan 2010
    Location: ck/shoving turn in 3b pots
    Posts: 814
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    Depends a lot on the reads you have (you didn't give much info by just stating he's a 'weak' reg), but overall I like c/c more.

    Obviously when you c/r this big you shouldn't be planning to fold to a shove.
    Almito is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-02-2012, 04:54 PM   #3
    journeyman
     
    shiftizzle2k9's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2011
    Posts: 359
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    Knew I'd forgot something, added them in now :P
    shiftizzle2k9 is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-02-2012, 04:55 PM   #4
    journeyman
     
    shiftizzle2k9's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2011
    Posts: 359
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    Apparantly I can't edit my op

    anyway reads are that he opens 81% and cbetting 60%, is a thinking player and I have c/r 71% in a small but decent sample
    shiftizzle2k9 is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-02-2012, 05:09 PM   #5
    old hand
     
    AnJo280's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Mar 2009
    Posts: 1,655
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    i´d probably c/shove because he´s got a wide range but all we accomplish by raise/calling like that is for him to play back light with hands like Kx that we want him to fold.
    especially since we´re shallow enough for him to discount a lot of aces out of the calling range. And since he has more Aces in his range we´re expected to flat our Queens and nines leaving almost only draws and air in our range.
    AnJo280 is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-02-2012, 08:07 PM   #6
    enthusiast
     
    Join Date: May 2012
    Posts: 90
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    yeah i'd c/c this flop all day, we have a weak draw that can't really call his 3bet, but when we c/c on this board we can't have many air (from his POV) so if he checks back turn we can profitably bluff on the river, not to mention that we can actually hit some outs and vbet accordingly
    naoko is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-03-2012, 08:44 AM   #7
    Pooh-Bah
     
    Punch Dancer's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Oct 2009
    Location: it is ofc not about the move
    Posts: 4,687
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    read dependant, but if I c/r here i'd do a small size for 3 reasons:
    -Discourages his 3b because of awkward stacks
    -Doesn't commit us to the hand w/ a weak draw
    -Gives us room to triple barrel on scary run outs
    Punch Dancer is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-03-2012, 02:08 PM   #8
    adept
     
    Join Date: Apr 2009
    Posts: 1,004
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    check/shove

    sturbo? what nick?
    jeffreyPL1 is online now   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-03-2012, 10:47 PM   #9
    veteran
     
    coffeeyay's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
    Posts: 2,715
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Punch Dancer View Post
    read dependant, but if I c/r here i'd do a small size for 3 reasons:
    -Discourages his 3b because of awkward stacks
    -Doesn't commit us to the hand w/ a weak draw
    -Gives us room to triple barrel on scary run outs
    this

    (but i don't play this deep )
    coffeeyay is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-04-2012, 01:25 AM   #10
    grinder
     
    Join Date: Nov 2011
    Posts: 672
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by coffeeyay View Post
    this

    (but i don't play this deep )
    We are only 23bb deep.
    iL1keTurtles is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old 07-05-2012, 01:32 PM   #11
    veteran
     
    coffeeyay's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Aberdeen, Scotland
    Posts: 2,715
    Re: Ipoker $30+1.50 JT vs weak reg

    but there's like over 1k chips each, i have no idea how many bbs that can actually be

    also not sure at all of population tendencies etc.

    but if it were 23bb deep in a stars hyper then i'd do exactly what punch suggests
    coffeeyay is offline   Reply With Quote

    Reply
          

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin®
    Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
    Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive