There are some statements in this thread where i need some further information from you guys, because i do not agree unless you explain me your thought process better

...
@Quimp
"Given his passive tendencies i would just check"
If he is passive he will not raise us a high% of time so betting for value with our draw and overcard(s) doesn't seem bad to me - I mean, we have a lot of equity and he will not raise us off our hand all that often.
"I'd expect villain to check back with some hands that would call a bet, probably
including 6x. "
Our equity vs 6x is good, and we can fold out this specific hand easily on later streets.
"we can't barrel without hitting"
if he flat calls this flop i think his range is very capped and we can barrel a lot of turns (A,K,Q,J,7 and even other low cards that makes us flushdraws, or to set up a River jam)
@borell
"Check is optimal option because if we cbet he is often raising and we cant continue. Thanks guys!"
Why do you think he is raising often?
@Beeni
"I always wait until I really got something against those players because he wont fold a lot of stuff. So just wait for better spots to get your money in."
I generally don't like the "waiting for a better spot attitude". But especially in this case it's not like we flopped nothing. A double gutter with overcards (agreed one is bad) and backdoor flush draw is not that bad