Quote:
I have seen many games at the top payouts where players just frantically want to deal and not play poker. Isn't a game where you have a spin and then nobody wants to play poker kind of missing the point? This to me would favor reducing the top payouts so that people want to play poker and not just spin for a top prize and then deal. A change that would still keep high payouts but at a balancing point where players still want to compete.
This is the problem PS is facing. Noone wants to wait 20000 tournaments and then finish 1000 bi tournament on second place with 100 BI.
Not fish, not reg. Its just insane lottery.
However, if they accept dealmaking it would automatically mean that spin & go's in current form are silly and need to be redone, to the point where they can work without deal making.
And they don't want to make them reasonable as it appears.
Lets say they accept deal making.
Everytime a 1200 BI tournament lottery occurres players will split the money at start and leave with 400 BI each.
This can effectively be replaced with a
JACKPOT! YOU WON 400BI message, the money gets credited to your account and a normal spin & go begins.
This, however, sounds a little too much like anything but poker.