Quote:
Originally Posted by mela
Hi yaqh,
I purchased the kindle version and have been enjoying the read so far. Great work, hands down. Greetings from another PhD candidate.
I seem to have a few questions though, it would be great if you can answer here.
Thanks -- sure, np
Quote:
Originally Posted by mela
a) On page 47, why are hands like Ks6s missing from Hero's range, whereas Qs6s is included? Is it due to combo discounting?
Yea, so for context, we're talking about the Hero's range at the beginning of river play on J63ssJo2o after he flatted OOP 75 BB deep, check-raised flop, and barreled turn. (Incidentally, SB in this hand is Mersenneary.)
I essentially just picked some combos of flushdraws to include. I gave some discussion of why I think we should discount flushdraws in BBs range there, but there was no real reason to include Q6ss but not K6ss. I could have done something like included 40% of each of the individual flush draw combos, but that range listing is verbose enough already. Of course, the focus there was on applying the equilibration exercise to a hand example, and the particular river starting ranges we worked with were somewhat secondary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mela
b) On page 48, you mentioned "he may as well just open shove himself. Not doing so just gives the BB more strategic options without giving himself~" However, can't we induce him to 3b shove hands that he wouldn't call openjam with, which is a profitable outcome for us?
Page 88? So, the claim is, if we're short-stacked enough that we can't fold to a jam after minraising preflop, we should just open-shove ourselves.
The idea is basically that minraising just gives your opponent extra strategic options that he could take advantage of. Like, if it would be best for him if you had just played shove-or-fold in the first place, then he can make that effectively be the case by just playing shove-or-fold facing your minraise -- in this case, because you never fold to the jam, your open is effectively a jam and his jam is effectively a call. Or -- he can opt to use his option to flat-call your open sometimes, but he should only do this if it benefits him. So, whereas you could have forced him to play fold-or-get-it-in with your open, you still give him the option to play that game if he wants to, but you also give him an extra option that he should only use if its to his benefit. If he's playing well, this can only cost you money.
Of course, if your opponent is likely to take his extra decision-making opportunities and do something stupid with them, it might be best to give him the rope. I talk about this more in the Trends and Lessons section at the end of the chapter -- pgs 106-107.
Cheers,
Will