Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** ***HU SNG REGS THREAD***

10-24-2014 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by watergun7
As eddymitchel has pointed out- some ppl tried converting e.g. 100usd to eur and back again and found that they lost a few cents. So I don't think what you posted is true.
yeah but losing a few cents is nothing like the ~2.5% that's happening. the couple of cents is rounding errors going in stars favour
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by callme
Do the player funds pop up in the balance sheets? If thats the case then i guess, yeah it would probably be used in case of liquidation for creditors and we as "customers" wouldnt see too much of it.
they'd show up in the balance sheet as a liability just like deposits with a bank are a liability to the bank i'd imagine
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 07:58 PM
"Moody's expects the company's revenue and EBITDA will grow at a rate of between 20% and 30% over the next two years from a combination of organic growth and further market share gains in online poker, and introduction of other real money casino games, launch of sports betting and the deployment of new gaming and lottery machines."

Is it public knowledge what kind of growth PS was having under old owners? Did PS ever release any financial statements or due to being a private company just keep that all under wraps?
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iL1keTurtles
they'd show up in the balance sheet as a liability just like deposits with a bank are a liability to the bank i'd imagine
Yes - it's a liability and based on pokerstars FAQ, unsecured. I don't know whether all pokerstars' depositors understand this.

I'm not saying it's anything too bad but we are taking a credit risk. For people who have significant sums of money tied up with pokerstars, I'd recommend you pay attention to Amaya's financials
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pies01
Yes - it's a liability and based on pokerstars FAQ, unsecured. I don't know whether all pokerstars' depositors understand this.

I'm not saying it's anything too bad but we are taking a credit risk. For people who have significant sums of money tied up with pokerstars, I'd recommend you pay attention to Amaya's financials
what exactly does unsecured mean in this context? i know an unsecured loan is making a loan without taking any collateral, but the word unsecured doesn't make any sense to me here. wouldn't the players be the first in line in the event of Amaya going bust? aren't the depositors of a bank the first in line if a bank goes under?
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 09:18 PM
You cant compare that with a bank as most have expilict deposit insurance up to a certain amount that is covered and guaranteed by special funds. But e.g. if you havr more money in the account than the insurance will cover... well, take a line BEHIND all the other creditors...
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 09:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iL1keTurtles
what exactly does unsecured mean in this context? i know an unsecured loan is making a loan without taking any collateral, but the word unsecured doesn't make any sense to me here. wouldn't the players be the first in line in the event of Amaya going bust? aren't the depositors of a bank the first in line if a bank goes under?
in the event that Amaya went into liquidation or became bankrupt, Amaya's unsecured liabilities (mainly us as customers) would be disregarded. So we lose out basically.

Even if we were taken into consideration we would get miniscule compared to what banks, whom Amaya have debt with, and shareholders would receive.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oiser17
in the event that Amaya went into liquidation or became bankrupt, Amaya's unsecured liabilities (mainly us as customers) would be disregarded. So we lose out basically.

Even if we were taken into consideration we would get miniscule compared to what banks, whom Amaya have debt with, and shareholders would receive.
Unsecured ceditirs (eg probably us) rank in front of shareholders. Shareholders almost always receive 0 in liquidation so I wouldn't take huge comfort in that.

By the way, if you exclude deposit insurance/government guarantees, you are taking a risk when depositing with banks too ie it's unsecured. It's just that the credit rating is typically a lot higher and the liquidity requirements are a lot more robust with banks (particularly after the global financial crisis). Of course, there are banks with poor credit ratings too - that's why I'd be interested in knowing which European bank is holding our deposits.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 09:36 PM
Regarding Stars currency conversion new fees - all you need do is convert in client to whatever your bank account is to avoid any fees (except for the above mentioned pennies from rounding)

So if your bank is in Euros, deposit Euros to the Euro cashier on Stars. Convert them across to USD, play husng in USD for a while. When cashout, send back to Euro balance then cashout to your bank. The low limits for conversions mentioned earlier are easily raised with an email to support, they're similar to the initially very low limits for xfer to other players.

What really does suck is if you live in a country that uses a currency Stars does not have a cashier for

Monteroy made an excellent post in the IP thread I will quote below.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monteroy
This post will attempt to give an overall summary of the situation, because it seems many are still generally confused with how this works.

- Exchanging money within the Stars cashier system between two currencies does not have a charge to it (will get to the rounded penny later).

- Exchanging money as part of a withdrawal or deposit does come with a 2.5-3% charge.

- The smart way for a player (who cashes out in US, Canadian, Euros or Pounds) to move money to and from Pokerstars to the real world is to convert it to the proper currency within the Stars client first, or match the currency deposited to the appropriate cashier within Stars (ie: do not deposit Euros into the US cashier).

- Pokerstars has the following term within their terms and conditions

The use of the Currency Exchange Facility and/or User's account to engage in currency trading or speculation is strictly prohibited. To help maintain the integrity of the Currency Exchange facility, PokerStars has the right to, in its sole discretion:

require that funds held in a User's account and converted via the Currency Exchange Facility into a different currency be used for playing the Games before being cashed out, transferred or used for any other purpose;



That seems a bit vague and spooky, but anyone can contact Pokerstars to ask if one can exchange money within the client before withdrawing and they will say it is fine.

What the above condition is really for is to protect Stars from people that exploit changes in the currency price before Pokerstars adjusts their vig free price. Ladbrokers got hit pretty hard by people who would do this by buying the appropriate currency before Ladbrokers did its daily price adjustment.

Hence, if a person is swapping currencies within the cashier back and forth for no apparent reason (ie: to play or withdraw) then that is what Stars will not be happy about.


- Limits exist for how much can be exchanged. Teh default appear to be 3k per day, 5k per week and 10k per month.

I emailed Stars support and they told me that the limits can be increased (subject to an account review) when I reach close to my limit. After receiving this I did a 3k US transfer and emailed support back and they increased the limits to the following:

USD 7,500.00 - new limit per day
USD 10,000.00 - new limit per 7 days
USD 20,000.00 - new limit per 30 days


I assume these can be increased again if this facility is used in a proper manner, much like player transfer limits are increased as needed (again, subject to account review).

I also assume that those that need to exceed their limits for a specific reason (ie they win the Sunday Million and do not wish to take 2 years to avoid the 3% fee) can contact Pokerstars for a one time help in that regard.

The reality is the situation above probably has minimal or no impact on the majority of players if they use some common sense (which is easier once the raw emotions calm down), but that certainly does not mean this change was handled in an ideal manner.


- Pokerstars method of communicating this change was horrible and I agree it does not reflect well on the new owners. I feel bad for Josem, who's OP almost feels like a person being forced to go out and say what was in that message. Why they did not email all their customers about this change (with more clear wording) is a valid concern, and hopefully Pokerstars will come out with a proper explanation for this in future.

- The rounded penny (no matter what, they round down when exchanging within the client whether by the cashier or buying into a tabl;e/tournament) is a very valid concern, particularly for cash players since every time they join and leave a table they get hit (MTT people do not frequently buy in and unregister to really validate much concern in that area).

I am not sure how they handled this situation before this change (since often times a person leaves with a different amount than one started at the table), but this is an area where Pokerstars should make it very clear what the policy is and why.

- People who cannot cash out in one of the cashier currencies are put in a bad position and Pokerstars should properly acknowledge that.


As always with these types of events one needs to let the "sky is falling" crowd calms down for a while and then hopefully all the details of this change can be understood and explained properly.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-24-2014 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pies01
Unsecured ceditirs (eg probably us) rank in front of shareholders. Shareholders almost always receive 0 in liquidation so I wouldn't take huge comfort in that.
Yes you are right. My mistake
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-25-2014 , 07:30 PM
No problems, it's just a technicality anyway.

By the way, Amaya have plenty of secured creditors judging by the financing details of the pokerstars' transaction. Note the interest rate they are paying too (source Wall street journal)...

-- Senior Secured Credit Facilities in the aggregate principal equivalent
amount in US Dollars of approximately $2.92 billion, and consisting of
the following:

-- a $1.75 billion seven-year first lien term loan priced at Libor plus
4.00%, and a EUR200 million seven-year first lien term loan priced at
Euribor plus 4.25%, in each case with a 1.00% floor;

-- a $100 million five-year first lien revolving credit facility priced at
Libor plus 4.00%, none of which was drawn at completion; and

-- an $800 million eight-year second lien term loan priced at Libor plus
7.00%, with a 1.00% floor.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-25-2014 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iL1keTurtles
"Moody's expects the company's revenue and EBITDA will grow at a rate of between 20% and 30% over the next two years from a combination of organic growth and further market share gains in online poker, and introduction of other real money casino games, launch of sports betting and the deployment of new gaming and lottery machines."

Is it public knowledge what kind of growth PS was having under old owners? Did PS ever release any financial statements or due to being a private company just keep that all under wraps?

"Oldford shareholders, including CEO Mark Scheinberg, will dispose of their shares to the Amaya subsidiary. Once the transaction is complete, Scheinberg and other Oldford principals “will resign from all positions with Oldford Group and its subsidiaries.” Rational’s executive management team will be retained.

The release also allowed some insight into the previously unknown world of Stars’ financial performance. The Oldford Group says it recorded revenue of $976m and $1.1b in 2012 and 2013 respectively, adjusted earnings of $342m and $420m, and cash flow from operations of $267m and $317m."
Source:
http://calvinayre.com/2014/06/13/bus...oker-for-4-9b/
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-26-2014 , 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pies01
...I read this to mean that if Amaya went bust, our money would be ranked in line with all other unsecured creditors...
You are reading it wrong.

Here's an article written by Joss Wood on pokerfuse on this issue: http://pokerfuse.com/features/in-dep...nd-protection/
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-26-2014 , 04:21 PM
Here is the term

"10.10You acknowledge and agree that if your User account is “active” (i.e. you have logged into your User account at any time during the prior 12 month consecutive period) monies deposited by you in your User account are held in a trust account on your behalf and are considered to be "End User's Deposits" in accordance with the trust arrangements with the Isle of Man Treasury Department. In the event that your User account is “inactive” (i.e. you have not logged into your User account for a consecutive 12 month period), monies deposited by you in your User account will cease to be "End User's Deposits" and will not be held in trust but will be immediately available to you for withdrawal or to use the Service in accordance with the terms of this Agreement from such time as you log into your User account and will be automatically reclassified as "End User's Deposits."

I have a few comments/questions
1) note the difference between active and inactive within the terms of service. How does that change the legal status for the funds for the creditors?
2) the agreement to treat our deposits as "end user deposits" with isle of man treasury, is that legally binding in liquidation? It seems like good practice and I can see that arrangement being valuable for the intetest rate pokerstars receive for the funds because they can get "retail look through" but I would be surprised if it changes the legal status of the deposits in liquidation.

I work in Liquidity Risk at a bank so I'm not just randomly guessing here but would be happy to be proven wrong.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-29-2014 , 06:44 AM
hi guys! maybe not the best place to discuss it but i think other regs can help me.
i really miss a stat from PT4 anyone has this one? 'bet flop after called 3bet IP vs missed cbet'? i mean probe the flop after called pre 3bet. thanks guys!
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-29-2014 , 11:24 PM
ho lee *** what are they doing? Im so mad atm ffs





http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...anets-1485512/

is this real life

also spin n go 3000x multiplier once in 100k games instead of 1000x
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-29-2014 , 11:41 PM
why are they doing this, wat
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 12:42 AM
Amaya is just trolling the entire reg community at this point, we are clearly not wanted at AmayaStars.com any more.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 01:03 AM
This was always the danger when there was no realistic competition.
They've decided they can f*ck us and there's nothing we can do about it.
Let's all take our business to FTP!


Oh.. hang on...
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 01:25 AM
partypokers/888/ipoker chance right now to imo

redesign software make changes for the poker community and they have a decent chance
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 06:16 AM
good night sweet prince
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 06:17 AM
I hope people who supported pokerstars with swing and go playing devil advocate will open their eyes now.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 06:56 AM
Thats only a start. Wait to see how many changes will have been done by this time next year gg amaya
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 07:00 AM
regs have to get better , that s it, easy game!
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote
10-30-2014 , 07:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddymitchel
I hope people who supported pokerstars with swing and go playing devil advocate will open their eyes now.
What does this have to do with the new format. You could just as well say that for people who favored hypers in the past or on an even broader spectrum all the people who allowed pokerstars to become a monopoly.

Its our all fault and now we pay for and we keep paying for it until we actually start building up competition.
***HU SNG REGS THREAD*** Quote

      
m