Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
General question (shallow hu) General question (shallow hu)

05-03-2017 , 10:46 AM
Against recs who dont iso almost at all, do you limp hands like A9o, ATo, KJo, QJo, QTo lets say 5-8 bb deep? Is it better just shove that kind of hands since the villain never iso's against limps?
General question (shallow hu) Quote
05-03-2017 , 10:57 AM
Obviously it's better to valueshove. The only reason you should limp them is to induce from weaker hands.
General question (shallow hu) Quote
05-03-2017 , 01:28 PM
Those hands seem like valueshoves indeed, you're getting called by worse often.

Do we have any limping range here? Because I understand the question I think. Do we prefer to see flop with certain range to jamming? For example T9, 98, 76 type hands. If not in the 5-8bb part (because we can not really limp-fold, and limp-calling seems bad with the hands I mentioned), then where is the cut-off to where we stop limping?
General question (shallow hu) Quote
05-03-2017 , 02:12 PM
That's what Im thinking too. Should we jam those hands at 10-12 BB too against those villains who never iso's?
General question (shallow hu) Quote
05-04-2017 , 02:16 AM
just look what is highest % - call os, 3bet or iso and choose action which gets you all in the most
General question (shallow hu) Quote
05-04-2017 , 06:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by none888
just look what is highest % - call os, 3bet or iso and choose action which gets you all in the most
And what if I prefer not to be ai with the part of my range with the lowest expectancy from a shove? Can we play differently with the bottom (+top) part of our range at these effective stacks? F.e. Limp-folding lowest part, limp-calling top part.
General question (shallow hu) Quote
05-04-2017 , 06:35 AM
I mean that only counts for your value hands vs his range, if he only goes all in with like top 20% of his range obviously you dont want to go all in with something like KQ, than you choose action whichever you allows to see flop the most.
General question (shallow hu) Quote

      
m