iPoker - 10/20 NL (2 max) - Holdem - 2 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

SB: 22.2 BB (VPIP: 82.35, PFR: 64.29, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 17)
Hero (BB): 27.8 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has T J

SB raises to 2 BB, Hero calls 1 BB

Flop: (4 BB, 2 players) 3 9 Q
Hero checks, SB bets 2 BB, Hero raises to 6 BB, SB raises to 20.2 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 14.2 BB

Turn: (44.4 BB, 2 players) 7

River: (44.4 BB, 2 players) A

SB shows 4 Q (One Pair, Queens)
(Pre 51%, Flop 63%, Turn 66%)
Hero shows T J (Flush, Ace High)
(Pre 49%, Flop 37%, Turn 34%)
Hero wins 44.4 BB

reads on villain are that he's a reg, also he called my small check raise when I had top 2 pair with bottom pair on 2JQ rainbow board. My logic was that vs reg it's more important than usual to balance and I thought 10Js is the best hand to semibluff raise here as I probably have 93s, and Q9 combos which want to raise for value. Is it over bluffing to raise all suited 10J here with BDFD?, I feel it is if I raised all 10J but would really appreciate input on that too.

Id x/r only with strong hands for value and, if villain folds to raises a lot, some air too with bd equity.

This exact hand is neither of these type, it's strong enough to just call.

You even said the villain called with a bottom pair earlier

thanks a lot for your reply, he also had a really high cbet percentage albeit over a smallish sample size so I felt like I had a lot of fold equity. also I felt like given his flat with bottom pair, I could easily barrel him off most of his flats. I see your point about just check raising for value. I'll have to give this situation some more thought. do you think for bluff hands a hand like 108o would be better for a checkraise then which we aren't priced in to calling a jam?

Yes, imo bluffs would be hands that are a bit too weak to call.