Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
 hyper - bluff-catching spot vs aggro  hyper - bluff-catching spot vs aggro

04-29-2017 , 07:36 AM
Villain limped the majority of hands and limp-cbet 88%. He seemed more aggro (for example iso 8/10, AFq 63). This is a snap-call right? Also when readless?

PokerStars - 10/20 NL (2 max) - Holdem - 2 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (BB): 28.5 BB
SB: 21.5 BB (VPIP: 90.24, PFR: 53.85, 3Bet Preflop: 22.22, Hands: 46)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has T J

SB calls 0.5 BB, Hero checks

Flop: (2 BB, 2 players) A 4 5
Hero checks, SB bets 1 BB, Hero raises to 2.5 BB, SB calls 1.5 BB

Turn: (7 BB, 2 players) T
Hero checks, SB bets 4.65 BB, Hero calls 4.65 BB

River: (16.3 BB, 2 players) 3
Hero checks, SB bets 13.35 BB and is all-in
 hyper - bluff-catching spot vs aggro Quote
05-07-2017 , 04:42 PM
Up
 hyper - bluff-catching spot vs aggro Quote
05-08-2017 , 03:53 AM
Flop looks close between all three options, but raising is probably fine given his high lcb.

River does not look like a snap call to me. We don't beat much outside of a busted flush draw and I don't know if that's enough. Tbh I would need some spazzy reads on villain to call here and unlikely to call readless.

63% AFq is not super spazzy and high ISO doesn't indicate wide 3-barrell-bluffing either imo.
 hyper - bluff-catching spot vs aggro Quote

      
m