Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Tournament Poker > Midstakes MTT

Notices

Midstakes MTT Discussion and analysis of midstakes MTT strategy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2012, 05:49 PM   #16
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
desperad0oo7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: near your blinds
Posts: 9,407
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

7557 pf.

getting it in now
desperad0oo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 06:16 PM   #17
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
CBorders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: yo no soy por aqui
Posts: 15,802
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by LottaNirvana View Post
With over 33 BB's effective (vs BB) as a 3 bet? I can see that it gives me max fold equity, but it seems like that would be a losing play over the liong run. Unless I'm up against players I KNOW to be maniacs, I'm only getting called by premium hands here, 22 - 66 or 77 is almost always folding, 88 maybe and probably anything but AK is folding. So why would I shove pre when chances are I'm only getting called by a better hand? As I said, I had a tight image at the table, 2 orbits before, I 4-bet someone from LP with AJ suited and he folded and showed AQ and made a comment about how few hands I'd been playing,
If we just look at this spot as you versus the button, if he's only calling 99+ and AK then he needs to fold ~45% of the time for you to break even by shoving. Knowing that he has been an active opener, it's fair to say he's opening quite liberally from the button, meaning you can profitably shove this hand and worse against him. Obviously we have to factor in the BB calling a nonzero percentage of the time, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a situation where jamming isn't profitable in this spot.

As played I think it depends on how he's been sizing his raises and reraises and if he's aware of the table dynamic. If he's always choosing this larger sizing and he seems to realize that the button has been opening wide (also helps to know if button has been raise/folding with his current stack) then I'd probably stick it in his face.
CBorders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 03:39 PM   #18
journeyman
 
AimHigher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 321
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Just because shoving is +EV doesn't mean it's our most profitable option. I'd much rather raise/call than shove 33bbs effective.

Regarding the rest of the hand, I'm not thrilled about the fact he decided to commit himself nominally instead of just shoving as I think it looks stronger, but I don't really want to fold TT.
AimHigher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 03:54 PM   #19
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
CBorders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: yo no soy por aqui
Posts: 15,802
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by AimHigher View Post
Just because shoving is +EV doesn't mean it's our most profitable option. I'd much rather raise/call than shove 33bbs effective.
We aren't shoving 33bb effective.
CBorders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 04:03 PM   #20
banned
 
timetowom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: uncapped, every street
Posts: 2,887
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by AimHigher View Post
Just because shoving is +EV doesn't mean it's our most profitable option. I'd much rather raise/call than shove 33bbs effective.

Regarding the rest of the hand, I'm not thrilled about the fact he decided to commit himself nominally instead of just shoving as I think it looks stronger, but I don't really want to fold TT.
25 tho
timetowom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:32 PM   #21
journeyman
 
AimHigher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 321
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

BB is still in the hand. If he had 25 or less I'd be in the shove camp.
AimHigher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 01:43 PM   #22
Carpal \'Tunnel
 
CBorders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: yo no soy por aqui
Posts: 15,802
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by AimHigher View Post
BB is still in the hand.
What is your resteal range in the SB with ~25bb effective against a loose button and a BB that covers? What range do you think BB calls our shove with?
CBorders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 02:29 PM   #23
banned
 
timetowom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: uncapped, every street
Posts: 2,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBorders View Post
What is your resteal range in the SB with ~25bb effective against a loose button and a BB that covers? What range do you think BB calls our shove with?
Good question CBarnesandNoble
timetowom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 03:34 PM   #24
journeyman
 
AimHigher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 321
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBorders View Post
What is your resteal range in the SB with ~25bb effective against a loose button and a BB that covers? What range do you think BB calls our shove with?
1. I'm open to feedback, but post ante something like: 44+, JTs+, QTs+, KTs+, A8s+, ATo+, KJo+, QJo.

Hands like JTo, QTo, KTo and 22, 33 seem like 'tweeners. At some point between 25BBs and 20BBs I'm more comfortable shoving them as well.

2. If we shove 40k? I dunno, 99+ and AQ+ maybe?

I think the big reason why I'm advocating going nominal is because whatever choice I'm making - I'm making it with the entirety of my range.

I don't want to be reshoving 33bbs with AA here because I don't want him to hesitate with hands that are on the fence vs a 33bb reshove but he'd happily 4-bet shove for value over a 3bet. If it widens his range from 6% to 8% when we get it in pre with him it's pretty significant for us.

I also think there's possibly hands in my range I can profitably 3bet/call vs BTN but can't profitably 3bet/call vs BB when he does wake up with a hand he can 4bet shove for value. It might still be possible to 3bet/shove those hands profitably even with BB behind but I think we can perhaps pick up a bit of extra EV here and there if we go nominal with them.

Last edited by AimHigher; 07-24-2012 at 03:44 PM.
AimHigher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 11:22 PM   #25
veteran
 
LottaNirvana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Working my way UP to Donk status.
Posts: 2,129
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by CBorders View Post
If we just look at this spot as you versus the button, if he's only calling 99+ and AK then he needs to fold ~45% of the time for you to break even by shoving. Knowing that he has been an active opener, it's fair to say he's opening quite liberally from the button, meaning you can profitably shove this hand and worse against him. Obviously we have to factor in the BB calling a nonzero percentage of the time, but you'd be hard-pressed to find a situation where jamming isn't profitable in this spot..
Yes, my plan was to shove over a BTN 4 bet, his stack size, position and previous play demand that. But... my problem was that I had "shove on the brain" because of the BTN. ...and didn't really think it through when the BB 4 bet. I think I agree with SSNYC's post & instinct that this is probably a fold. (not just because of the result)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AimHigher View Post
Just because shoving is +EV doesn't mean it's our most profitable option. I'd much rather raise/call than shove 33bbs effective.

Regarding the rest of the hand, I'm not thrilled about the fact he decided to commit himself nominally instead of just shoving as I think it looks stronger, but I don't really want to fold TT.
Yup

Quote:
Originally Posted by AimHigher View Post
BB is still in the hand. If he had 25 or less I'd be in the shove camp.
I agree 100%....but he didn't have 25BB's or less. he had about 60 and it was my 33 BB's that made the effective stack. (so his survival wasn't at stake)
after BB raises & BTN folds.. my plan and therefore my decision process was derailed...
This is very close, but I think I let the fact that I had been card dead and the fact that I thought the BTN was making a move get in the way of thinking through the dynamics of what the BB was doing.

Not to be results oriented, but for those that want to know....
Spoiler:

Last edited by LottaNirvana; 07-24-2012 at 11:28 PM.
LottaNirvana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 03:19 AM   #26
old hand
 
beaverslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,316
7200 for your 3b; villain's(bb) 4b sizing is weird and bad-his hand is face up as AK and i'm probaby gambling so shove with no FE and win the race. Tell him you slay old dolts for hobby after u win the flip. Another line if i ever think bb is aggro and may get out of line is flat btn open and reshove on the bb's squeeze here if i think he light and btn folds.
beaverslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 11:41 AM   #27
veteran
 
LottaNirvana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Working my way UP to Donk status.
Posts: 2,129
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by beaverslayer View Post
Tell him you slay old dolts for hobby......
Actually, I do... I came in 3rd in the last WPT seniors MTT here in Miami.
Even tho I look young, act young and don't play like an old dolt, I'm 51 years old.
(smile).

As for the rest of your thoughts, thanks... Good advice......& I wish it had been a flip.
LottaNirvana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 12:14 PM   #28
old hand
 
beaverslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by LottaNirvana View Post
Actually, I do... I came in 3rd in the last WPT seniors MTT here in Miami.
Even tho I look young, act young and don't play like an old dolt, I'm 51 years old.
(smile).

As for the rest of your thoughts, thanks... Good advice......& I wish it had been a flip.
Wow, thats pretty sweet-congrats on the deep run! No offense/disrespect intended when throwing the "old dolt" term out there(i am sure a lot of players think i'm poker old too @ 32yo). Sucks he had JJ, i think its exactly AK or jj most of time and def a tough spot(for me anyway)betweem jamming with no FE or folding and saving yourself a healthy reshove stack. I always get a slight cringe though when its the prototypical 50+ yo that plays ABC that raises exactly like in this spot you had above vs. Someone younger than 30yo where i dont even think twice about shoving vs. The < 30yo.
beaverslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 12:32 PM   #29
veteran
 
LottaNirvana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Working my way UP to Donk status.
Posts: 2,129
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

Quote:
Originally Posted by beaverslayer View Post
Wow, thats pretty sweet-congrats on the deep run! No offense/disrespect intended when throwing the "old dolt" term out there(i am sure a lot of players think i'm poker old too @ 32yo). .
No offense taken....
Quote:
Sucks he had JJ, i think its exactly AK or jj most of time and def a tough spot(for me anyway)betweem jamming with no FE or folding and saving yourself a healthy reshove stack. .
Yeah, that's why I posted this hand. Most of the time, I have a pretty good idea about whether I played a hand well or not, (still tweaking my bet sizing for many hands, but that's another story). This is the hand in that tourney where I really wasn't sure if I played it right or not... ( now leaning towards NOT)

.
Quote:
I always get a slight cringe though when its the prototypical 50+ yo that plays ABC that raises exactly like in this spot you had above vs. Someone younger than 30yo where i dont even think twice about shoving vs. The < 30yo. .
I really didn't have a real read on him yet, but my gut told me I was in trouble there.... the fact that we were about to stop for a dinner break may have played into my decision too... Who wants to wait out a dinner break with a short stack? ( prob. Bad poker thinking there...LOL)
LottaNirvana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 02:16 PM   #30
deviation of equilibrium
 
furo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,370
Re: OoP w TT... awkward stack

snapppppppgetitin

Last edited by furo; 07-25-2012 at 02:17 PM. Reason: would fold A2o!
furo is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive