Two Plus Two Publishing LLC Two Plus Two Publishing LLC
 

Go Back   Two Plus Two Poker Forums > Tournament Poker > Midstakes MTT

Notices

Midstakes MTT Discussion and analysis of midstakes MTT strategy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2012, 01:21 PM   #16
Pooh-Bah
 
gregz41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,362
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

many thanks for that JITexpert, if he is jamming ATC like lissi suggested (the other guy is a total nit fish)

then calling with AQo (my actualy hand is ok)
gregz41 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 01:25 PM   #17
banned
 
timetowom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: uncapped, every street
Posts: 2,887
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Lolllll at thinking of folding AQ and wasting time creating a thread. Damn greg. I thought you'd have A7 or KJs or something
timetowom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 01:58 PM   #18
Pooh-Bah
 
gregz41's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,362
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

I was told my call was marginal, was only checking. Even the nit of MSMTT's can see a snap call.
gregz41 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:05 PM   #19
banned
 
Elephants_pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,043
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregz41 View Post
then calling with AQo (my actualy hand is ok)
I think it`s mostly bc of positions as someone noted (since you`d have to jam into a big stack).

Otherwise I see reasons to ICM fold AQ there.
Elephants_pride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:11 PM   #20
enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 78
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by JITxpert View Post
Here is a great thread on calling AI in ICM situations...
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/18...k-post-227022/
Page not found
My Name Is Lincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:29 PM   #21
banned
 
timetowom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: uncapped, every street
Posts: 2,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephants_pride View Post
I think it`s mostly bc of positions as someone noted (since you`d have to jam into a big stack).

Otherwise I see reasons to ICM fold AQ there.
What reasons
timetowom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:38 PM   #22
banned
 
Elephants_pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,043
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by timetowom View Post
What reasons
Payouts difference.

And it`s not like bigger stack rapes ICM shoving wide from button and you have also good stack and winning flip would allow you to take chip lead.

Even winning this flip you still will be far from being a contender.
Elephants_pride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:43 PM   #23
grinder
 
gg_wild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Prague
Posts: 486
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

would go with AJo+,ATs+,88+
think we can almost discount TT+,AQ+ from his shoving range
gg_wild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:50 PM   #24
banned
 
Elephants_pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,043
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by gg_wild View Post
think we can almost discount TT+,AQ+ from his shoving range
I think he`s balanced in shoving ATC being 10bb eff deep.
Elephants_pride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:53 PM   #25
old hand
 
JITxpert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,863
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by My Name Is Lincoln View Post
Page not found
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/36...k-post-227022/

Here you go!

And AQo is a snippty snap!!!!
JITxpert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 02:59 PM   #26
banned
 
Elephants_pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,043
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by JITxpert View Post
And AQo is a snippty snap!!!!
Still you say nothing about ICM affection on our decision.
I think this spot is not just about math.

Basically winning this the flip achieves nothing talking about payments & ICM.
We still would have to open-jam in a much bigger stack, who`d call pretty wide and still would be pretty far from shipping it.

And you have 63% only vs 50%+ ranges.
Elephants_pride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 03:04 PM   #27
grinder
 
gg_wild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Prague
Posts: 486
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephants_pride View Post
I think he`s balanced in shoving ATC being 10bb eff deep.
Fully depends on the reg, on dinamic and what he thinks about hero and the other guy.
And i don't think he need to be so much balanced here actually, cuz our shoving range isn't narrower then calling range or you are folding TT if he minraises for example?
gg_wild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 03:06 PM   #28
banned
 
Elephants_pride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 5,043
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by gg_wild View Post
And i don't think he need to be so much balanced here actually, cuz our shoving range isn't narrower then calling range or you are folding TT if he minraises for example?
lol.... that`s why he can open-jam his whole range. And that`s call balance.
Elephants_pride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 03:11 PM   #29
deviation of equilibrium
 
furo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 27,375
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

would fold AJ here.
furo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 03:12 PM   #30
grinder
 
gg_wild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Prague
Posts: 486
Re: $big 162 final table ICM spot

to Elephants_pride
Read it again pls, you got it wrong
I am sure that against the majority of the field it's better to r/c TT+,AQ+ than to openjam
gg_wild is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply
      

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2008-2010, Two Plus Two Interactive