Prior to my spewtardy hand, Villain had 3-bet 2 out of the 5 last hands including the previous hand, this was definitely fresh in my mind. Villain's stats were 21/20 over 71 hands but 3-betting a whopping 23% over 26 hands. I think the 23% 3-bet figure and remembering that the Villain had 3-bet twice so recently, including one hand, where someone called his 3-bet and then pulled a stop n go on him influenced my decision. The two lead-up hands, and then my hand follow. I mean I had a decent hand to 4-bet but not against this super strong shorty 3-bet. Villain is MP2 in first hand and BTN in second hand.
Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 9 A
3 folds, Hero raises to 300, MP3 folds, CO raises to 745, 3 folds, Hero raises to 7,913 and is all-in, CO calls 3,380 and is all-in
Flop: (8,610) 4 4 A (2 players, 2 are all-in) Turn: (8,610) J (2 players, 2 are all-in) River: (8,610) 7 (2 players, 2 are all-in)
Spoiler:
Results: 8,610 pot
Final Board: 4 4 A J 7
Hero showed 9 A and lost (-4,140 net)
CO showed J J and won 8,610 (4,470 net)
Given your description of the villian this isn't bad imo. I would rather do it with like kq because I don't think he has that many Ax worse than yours but a lot of kj-k9, qj-q8. You said he had a 23% 3b then u jam with a hand that is well off against a 23% 3b and say its spew?
Given your description of the villian this isn't bad imo. I would rather do it with like kq because I don't think he has that many Ax worse than yours but a lot of kj-k9, qj-q8. You said he had a 23% 3b then u jam with a hand that is well off against a 23% 3b and say its spew?
Somewhat small sample set on his 3-bet stats. I think his 21/20 numbers are more indicative of his play. I mean no one is going to 3-bet that much in the long run.