Quote:
Originally Posted by jpgiro
If you play KQo in that situation for 2BB, you're less likely to get everyone to fold to you and you're inviting action on a hand that plays poorly multiway.
If you play KQo in that situation for 4BB, you're more likely to get everyone to fold to you and are less likely to get multiway action.
Whether you call the shove really depends on stacks and ranges and I'm not sure how much difference 2BB vs. 4BB makes in the long run there.
Now if you're playing early and middle position, obviously you bet differently. And if you're playing hands that play better in a multi-handed situations like suited connectors, then you can bet smaller.
So again, my argument - if you're going to play a hand in early position that plays poorly multiway (and that includes pairs as well as unsuited broadway hands) then it is important to bet pre-flop in such a way where you have a better chance of thinning the field. If you're not willing to play that hand in early position for whatever reason (stack sizes, nature of play at table, etc.) then you're better off not playing the hand rather than just min raising.
If I'm wrong on that and there's statistical evidence to illustrate that, I'm all ears, though. To be clear, I'm here to get better and plug leaks in my game, and if overbetting PF is one of them I want to understand why.
I'm sorry, but this is so 1990's poker mindset. But you came to the right place. We'll catch you up to speed on modern poker strategy.
In today's game, raising 2.2BBs or 5BBs doesn't change the calling of your opponents. If they have a hand and they want to see a flop, they will call either bet. Just think about it. You are playing a loose player who likes to see alot of flops. Blinds are 150/300 +50 with 10k stacks. My bet size would be 650. If instead you bet to 1,050 (3.5x) do you really think the extra 400 is making them fold? In today's game you are not getting the loose players to fold.
Now if you bet smaller, as all the great players do, as I advocate and many of the other good players here, you are risking less. If you get called 4 ways and the flop is bad, you can walk away with only losing a small investment.
If you decide to c-bet your c-bet will be smaller. If that doesn't work, your investment was smaller and you walk away with more chips. Smaller bets = more opportunities to bet = more leverage.
On top of the logical argument presented, look at the empirical evidence. All of the players who are killing the MTTs. They are betting small. The players still betting large are not faring as well.
It seems illogical to someone who learned in the early 2000's as I did. I learned the same methods. but over the past 5 years, I've been slowly reducing my bet size and as my preflop bets get smaller, my results get better.