Yesterday I played the Sunday mini million on Pokerstars. In this particular situation there only 160 players left and I had a good stack size (33th or something). First price was $25k.
Moments before the break I had QQ early position. I opened it 2.1x. Then this guy calls with a big stack UTG+3. He is kind of reg with aprox. $26k profit.
The main question is: did I played it right?
I think the bet sizing on the flop was fine. I'm not sure about the turn though. Because of the 10 of clubs (3 clubs on deck) I checked/ called a 45% pot bet.
Alltough I played it fine, I would like to know your opinions. I was a little bid shocked when I saw his hand.
Thanks in advance.
Poker Stars, $20 Buy-in (10,000/20,000 blinds, 2,000 ante) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 9 Players Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite. View Hand #37690036
My bet was 42% of the pot on the flop. You would go 52/55%? Or more, like 62%? Off course in this particular situation it would have worked. But why bet bigger? To get value of A7s, 6's, 8s, and 10s?
What do you think villain peels pre?
Dont think we can cbet range.
That doesnt mean we need to check our whole range. We have a huge range advantage, we can get value from overpairs, 7x, AJ-AK, flush draws etc (even stupid floats like this one) and letting villain realize his equity for free especially with Ax is bad imo. I think this is a pretty clear bet, but u know better naf
Well all I know about this villain is what the OP said, so it's hard to say. Surely the standard play is to c bet when readless.
What range are you giving him to make you think this is a flop check?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Villains range should be tight so it seems optimistic to go for 3 streets.
Although QQ needs some protection it will be hard to play some runouts and realize equity in a bloated pot.
Villains range should be tight so it seems optimistic to go for 3 streets.
Although QQ needs some protection it will be hard to play some runouts and realize equity in a bloated pot.