Quote:
Originally Posted by owl_
Glad to see the upswing continues, OP. I enjoy this thread so far!
Would you mind spending just a little time elaborating on the aggressive bankroll management strategy you alluded to? I'd be interested to hear more about it. Thanks, and good luck!
Hey, thanks for taking the time to look over my thread and asking a solid, specific question.
As poker players one of the skills we need to be proficient at is risk management. One aspect of risk management in poker is the idea that if we are better than our opponents, we should, in the long run, be profiting against them (as long as our edge is larger than the rake).
For the sake of simplicity we will define certain specific bankroll management guidelines as have been suggested from expert players on 2+2 I'm order to realize long run variance.
Main three types of NL games played today and suggested bankrolls
Cash: 50-100 buy ins depending on your stake level and skill level compared to the competition.
SNGS: Same as cash.
Mtts: 100-200 buy ins.
Now these are pretty basic suggestions and honestly fairly vague. More of a suggestion for the masses and assume that you're a winning player. These suggestions are put in place to make sure that variance doesn't destroy your opportunity to succeed in the long run.
Once you begin to practice these rules you should start to define what's better for you and what you feel comfortable with. Some people might feel that those numbers I chose are either too aggressive or too passive. Again, these numbers can and should change over time once you realize what you're comfortable with.
As a general rule of thumb, the larger your edge is against the competition at a specific level the lower variance will be for you. So when I mentioned that I took an aggressive strategy when it came to my bank roll it was because I felt that my edge was huge against the competition. I could have instead chosen to either increase my bankroll and keep playing at the same stakes or drop in stakes, hence increasing my bankroll in comparison to the stakes.
Because of all of this information I had already acquired throughout the years of playing poker, I understood that I didn't need 50 buy ins to be playing $5 sngs when two years earlier I was crushing mis stakes sngs on pokerstars ($22-$55). I knew that I could have a terrible run but I felt that with a 20 buy in bankroll I could climb the stakes way faster and if I happened to go busto, finding another 20 buy ins for $11 sngs is as easy as a second deposit.
Mtts are a completely different beast. Once I switched over to only Mtts I began with a 40 buy in rule and now, after having had a 200 buy in downswing I realize was probably a bit TOO aggressive, Although the 40 buy in rule was for average stake of about $10 and my 200 buy in downswing was at $30 average stake so the competition is slightly more difficult.
I do think tho that mtt variance is so insane it requires a 100 buy In bankroll for lower stakes and 200 at least for mid-high stakes.
I hope you found all the Info useful. Sorry for rambling so long but I wanted to be thorough. If you have any comments or questions please feel free to ask.
Thanks