Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTyman9
Is pot correct on flop?
Exploitably, I'd would consider sizing down to fold equity on the turn, but hmm here I think we're just a bit too shallow for that (even though it somehow worked in this hand). I suspect the solver I use (Visions) would use a pot only sizing in this spot with a high frequency. Of course my hand is very weak and might be one of the few that is actually check/folded.
That being said, I strongly believe betting vs. a 68bb stack who limped as an exploit is the right play as his range is wide enough that he folds a lot more frequently, even on this low board texture because of having so many more non-connected hands. And we also have more equity when called lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTyman9
I forget if you already talked about this or not, but I know you have said you don't feel you deal with variance super well emotionally in some capacity. What factors make you choose plo vs nlhe? I would assume you either enjoy it a lot more or feel you have a higher winrate there to compensate for the higher variance?
I like switching between both to mix it up. I played some NLHE live today, 5bet with AKo vs a cold 4 vs an unknown older guy at 5/10 in BTN vs SB and BB and he had AA, in my mind I was thinking no way I could fold in this spot (100bb with large live poker sizings), but after the hand I felt maybe I should have. But as for online I do think the games are still significantly softer, like the overall optimal VPIPs in both games are comparable, but the average table VPIP on PLO200 vs NL200 on Global/Ignition is like, idk, ~2x?
Thanks for the comments as always