Quote:
Originally Posted by scotywynn
Oh boy, this is about an 80 hour conversation and I should have not started it. Ok, first I'm not trying to be rude only trying to help. U called a RR with J high no kicker, and please don't say cause it's suited. So ur bluffing big time. This is an advanced concept. No disrespect to dan but defending a J high hand is not even conceptual. It's so far out of theory it makes my head spin. Going over just a couple of hands I see way too many mistakes. Ur right learning poker is way hard. We have to start learning basic ABC poker first and foremost. And I'm talking about 1200 hours of study. Minimum. ask ur self this question. When I call or raise can I explain exactly why I did it. The biggest thing I see in ur hand posts is ur just gambling. i have to go, but maybe we should start a thread on ABC poker and learning how to study poker. Because learning where to start is the hardest part. Learning how to study is so much harder than advance concepts. Again only trying to help.
This is a post that is finally hinting at KP24's problem. KP24 is getting crushed at nl50 and did not beat nl10/nl25. Discussing 3bets,c-bet %,bluffing etc etc etc is a waste of time here. Example : preflop co makes standard raise,btn calls and KP calls in the blind with 9-8o ? ( and someone posted that this was ok - really ?)
You can beat nl5 through nl50 if you play a very simple game : play tight,make hands and get paid.
my advice to KP24 would be learn basic theory. read a lot in the beginners forum(sure some of it is dated and you have to remember that the games are more aggressive today than five years ago). read a beginners book( wallace's "No Limits" is pretty decent). harrington's six max cash book would help too. an intermediate book such as Bakker's "analytical no-limit hold'em will give kp plenty to think about long before he's ready to try matthew janda's book. Books will help teach what to think about when playing. miller's small stakes no-limit uses six max as the format for teaching basic concepts and is worth a read also.
get a subscription to cardrunners and watch all of verneer's microstakes videos. also watch videos about basic math.
All this studying ? i can almost hear some 2+2 saying you have to play a lot to learn the game. Playing basically helps you learn more about villains' ranges and how the play them. The books will jump start the learning with advice from experts instead of from fellow microstakes players. The books will show you what is the best decision ( which is primarily just a math problem) for a given set of assumptions about the villain(s).
Eliminate the playing 4 tables for x hours a week. KP needs to learn how to play, not make the same mistakes over and over again. if you're breakeven over about 150,000 hands at nl10 & nl25 ( forgot the 24 bi slaughter at nl50) you really should start at the beginning.
You can't bury a three from the corner under pressure unless you've spent a lot of time learning how to make a free throw.