Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioCassano
-What BRM do you use for the turbo's?
Past a certain minimum amount of bi's, I think this is extremely player-dependent. The consensus on this forum seems to be that ~40-50 bi's for turbos is appropriate, with this # becoming larger with every increase in stake (underlying assumption being that your edge over the field will decrease with every jump in stakes, thus increasing the throes of variance). That being said, there is a place for aggressive BRM (25-30 bi's) if you're comfortable accepting a greater risk of ruin and are not fazed by the possibility of losing a decent portion of your role in a session. It actually took me a really long time to not get fazed by losing multiple $55 bi's in a session, even with 70+ bi's in my roll. Now, however, I have enough confidence in my game and such a huge amount of bi's at my most common stake ($55s) that losing a large amount of buyins in a session doesn't faze me at all. I think I'm probably less comfortable than most people would be in this regard, however, due to my greater-than-average proclivity to tilt. At the $110s, with 60 bi's right now, losing a buyin stings more than I think it should or would for most people. I feel like once I get more $110s volume under my belt I'll be much more comfortable.
If I had to recommend a # of bi's for turbos, I'd say 55. I don't remember it off the top of my head, but there's a formula called the Kelly formula that I'm sure would be easy to find in a search where the variables are your comfort level (1-4), standard deviation, and ROI, that tells you what your ideal BR is. I'd recommend using that as a starting point and then using experience to make adjustments (which would probably entail modifying your comfort level).
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioCassano
-As a rough estimate what would you say is the Reg to Fish ratio at the midstakes ~$50ish games, obviously hypothetical as reg's tend to avoid each other but pretending that it was like lower stakes and game-selecting is not really an option.
Regs at the $55s and $110s seem really unwilling to sit other regs, so odds are you'll be facing a lot more fish/recreational husng players than regs/good players. My impression is that there's an abundance of fish at $55s (particularly over the weekend) but way too little fish to accomodate $110s regs. My average wait time for a $55 game varies a lot depending on the day/time of day but is probably ~two minutes, whereas my wait time for a $110 is ten minutes+. Fish rarely ever sit lobbies so you have to wait for them to come to you. If I had to guess the ratio for $55s I would say 3 fish for every reg/good player. One mistake I think people make, by the way, is focusing too much energy on figuring out how to beat good players--your biggest edge comes from dominating fish and I think that's what any good husng reg needs to have the best handle on. There are many, many varieties of fish (thankfully, fish tend to reveal which variety of fish they are pretty quickly) and you need to have a strategy ready to exploit any type.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioCassano
-Do you use a HUD? I know the norm in HUSNG's is not to bother but I use one and think it can actually be very useful.
Nope, and I think that you're right that most regs don't. Personally, I find the HUD distracting and find that it obstructs my instinctual sixth sense that I feel is the real touchstone of my game. That being said, however, there is definitely a place for a HUD since you'll probably find yourself playing dozens of games against the same opponents. There are lots of opponents I've played over 50 games against--HUD information can probably give you much better opportunity to make optimal adjustments over a big sample size. I have a pretty good memory, so I mostly rely on that, in conjunction with notes, which I take a fair amount of (most important: 3b frequencies, any weird/unusual lines - which give me insight into player type, calling/shoving/3b ranges).
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioCassano
-Do you have any tips for learning preflop <25 bb strategy. I mean 3/4bet jamming rather than nash. I have been playing low stakes in an attempt to get a 'feel' for this but am still struggling when playing someone half competent as I really have no experience with short stack play.
The best teacher for this zone of bbs is lots and lots of experience which will cement in your brain what the average player at the stake's range is. I have a unique approach to being short-stacked that I'd rather not write about on here b/c I think it's a big part of why I have an edge at my current stakes. I will say, though that onne common mistake people make is 4bet jamming weak aces too deep, or, alternatively, calling jams with weak aces too deep. At the $22s, I remember people overvalued raggy aces so much I'd usually just jam any AJ+ over a raise, even the first or second level, expecting to get called by any ace--definitely a profitable move at those stakes. Also, against fish even if you're 100% certain you will be flipping and pot odds are correct, my preference is to just wait for a better spot (it's usually pretty easy to set up a 68+% spot against a fish, plus you get more opportunity to outplay them postflop)
Hope these answers help, best of luck and feel free to keep asking questions
Last edited by karamazonk; 03-21-2011 at 06:55 PM.